Florida High Court to Weigh Tobacco Appeal

Albanese, Elisabeth
July 2004
Bond Buyer;7/21/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31930, p28
Trade Publication
Reports on Philip Morris USA Inc.'s filing of a brief with the Florida Supreme Court asking that justices affirm a 2003 appellate court decision overturning a judgment in a lawsuit accusing tobacco companies of lying to smokers about health risks associated with tobacco. Overview of the case; Punitive damages assessed against tobacco companies.


Related Articles

  • Illinois High Court Hears Oral Arguments in Tobacco Lawsuit. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;11/12/2004, Vol. 350 Issue 32009, p40 

    Reports on the oral arguments presented in the Illinois Supreme Court in a lawsuit filed against Philip Morris USA Inc. by cigarette smokers in the state who claimed that misleading advertising made them believe that light cigarettes were a healthier option than full-flavored ones. Lower court...

  • Ruling in Price v. Philip Morris Appeal Expected Thursday in Illinois. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/14/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32278, p6 

    This article reports that a decision will be given by Illinois Supreme Court for the case in which Philip Morris USA Inc. is required to pay a $10.1 billion judgment to "light" cigarette smokers. Capitalists and financiers are awaiting the outcome of the case, because of its probable impact on...

  • Colorado Treasurer Renews Call for Securitization of '98 Tobacco MSA. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/16/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32280, p31 

    The article reports that Colorado Treasurer Mark Hiliman has said that he would recommend to lawmakers that the state securitize its share of the 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). The Colorado Treasury has recommended that the state issue debt backed by its approximately $1 billion...

  • Tobacco Bonds Get Another Boost As High Court Lets Illinois Ruling Stand. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;11/28/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32516, p35 

    The article presents information on a litigation, in which an Illinois court directed Philip Morris USA Inc. to pay $10.1 million to its plaintiffs. The U.S. Supreme Court also let the ruling stand. The plaintiffs are smokers, who were misled by the company's advertisement, which claimed that...

  • Tobacco companies settle lawsuit. Soule, Alexander // Fairfield County Business Journal;11/24/2008, Vol. 47 Issue 47, p9 

    The article reports on the settlement of a lawsuit by Darien, Connecticut-based Nordic American Smokeless Inc. a lawsuit with Philip Morris USA over the latter's use of Taboka brand name. Nordic American Smokeless Inc. is an affiliate of Taboca A/S, under the Nordic Ice and Klondike brands....

  • Philip Morris CEO: Policy changes were not ploys. Roxe, Hilary // Buffalo Law Journal;4/18/2005, Vol. 77 Issue 31, p19 

    Reports on the testimony of CEO Michael Szymanczy of Philip Morris USA Inc. in a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department regarding the decision of the company to shift its policies on publicizing the risks of smoking in the U.S. Reason for shifting its policies; Allegation of the U.S....

  • Philip Morris Says $12B Appeal Bond Could Prove Devastating. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;4/1/2003, Vol. 344 Issue 31605, p1 

    tate attorneys general may intervene in a lawsuit against Philip Morris USA Inc. because of concerns that a 12 billion dollars court-ordered appeal bond could force the company into bankruptcy and jeopardize payments owed to states under the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with major...

  • Philip Morris Wants Expedited Hearing on $10.1B Verdict. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;5/14/2003, Vol. 344 Issue 31635, p4 

    Philip Morris USA Inc. has urged the Illinois Supreme Court to expedite a hearing on the company's effort to overturn a 10.1 billion dollar verdict by a Madison County Circuit Court in the Price v. Philip Morris class action lawsuit by smokers of cigarettes. In March, the company told Madison...

  • APPLIED WELLNESS.  // Electronic Ardell Wellness Report (E-AWR);06/15/2001, p3 

    Discusses a case against Philip Morris Cos. Inc. Outcome of the trial; Details of the case.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics