SEC Shifts Fraud Focus

Hume, Lynn
July 2004
Bond Buyer;7/14/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31925, p1
Trade Publication
Reports on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) filing of securities fraud charges against bond lawyer, Ira Weiss. Background of the case involving former investment banker L. Andrew Shupe II's sale of the Neshannock Township, Pennsylvania School District; Weiss' opinion that the school district's notes were tax-exempt; Presiding of the case by SEC administrative law Judge Lillian A. McEwen; Allegations under the securities fraud charges filed by SEC.


Related Articles

  • SEC to Fight Weiss, Settle With Shupe Over School Notes. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;7/7/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31920, p4 

    Reports that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to press forward with its securities fraud charges against bond lawyer Ira Weiss, but may have settled similar charges against investment banker L. Andrew Shupe. SEC's claim that Weiss and Shupe misled...

  • Judge Finds 'Systemic Problems' in Miami. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;6/25/2001, Vol. 336 Issue 31167, p4 

    Reports on Miami, Florida's violation of the securities fraud laws by knowingly misleading investors about its deteriorating financial condition. Ruling made by United States Securities and Exchange Commission chief administrative law judge Brenda Murray; Case background; Securities fraud...

  • SEC: Weiss Violated Fraud Laws. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;12/5/2005, Vol. 354 Issue 32271, p1 

    The article reports on a ruling by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which states that bond lawyer Ira Weiss has neglected and violated the securities fraud laws. Weiss misguided to investors that $9.6 million of three-year school notes sold by the Neshannock, Pennsylvania,...

  • Lawyers: Does Weiss Ruling Counter SEC Policy? Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;6/8/2006, Vol. 356 Issue 32398, p4 

    The article reports on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's ruling that bond counsel Ira Weiss violated securities laws by acting negligently. The ruling appears to run counter to the commission's policy of more than two decades. The commission is also planning to enforce...

  • SEC: Raters' Actions Support Case Against Ex-Chief of Miami Hospital. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;2/13/2006, Vol. 355 Issue 32218, p6 

    The article reports that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is urging a federal judge in Florida not to dismiss its securities fraud charges against Bruce Perry, former head of the Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, claiming the SEC has a good case against him. The SEC's...

  • A Fool and His Money--.  // Saturday Evening Post;12/1/1934, Vol. 207 Issue 22, p22 

    Presents views and insights on the promise of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for a relentless campaign against stock swindlers and securities fraud in the U.S. Views of National Surety Co. chairman William B. Joyce on the annual loss incurred from stock, credit, and insurance...

  • Suit alleges Ponzi scheme for touted firm. The Associated Press // Marketing News;9/24/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 20, p41 

    The article reports that United States District Court judge Owen M. Panner has granted the Securities and Exchange Commission's request to halt an alleged $100 million Ponzi-like securities scam by the operators of four firms, including Alpha Telecom Inc. The people and companies involved in the...

  • The Conman and the Sheriff: SEC Jurisdiction and the Role of Offshore Financial Centers in Modem Securities Fraud. Dhesi, Nick S. // Texas Law Review;May2010, Vol. 88 Issue 6, p1345 

    Congress founded the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1934 in the wake of the greatest financial collapse in history. More than seventy years later, the SEC, charged by Congress with a mandate to preserve the national public interest through fair and honest markets, remains a critical...

  • Court Rules For SEC in Bradbury Case, But Dismisses Weiss Charges. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;2/28/2005, Vol. 351 Issue 32079, p1 

    This article reports that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) received two divergent rulings by administrative law judges in separate municipal enforcement cases, one a partial victory for the enforcement division that sanctioned broker-dealer Dolphin & Bradbury (D&B) for...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics