Court Reignites Patients' Rights Debate

Heil, Emily; Smallen, Jill; Mitchell, Charlie
June 2004
National Journal;6/26/2004, Vol. 36 Issue 26, p2031
Reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 21, 2004 over a case that patients can not go through state courts to sue health maintenance organizations for malpractice. Laws and facts disputed in the case; Arguments taken by parties involved.


Related Articles

  • ERISA pre-empts patient's negligence claim against HMO. Sfikas, Peter M. // Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA);Dec2003, Vol. 134 Issue 12, p1651 

    A recent decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which held that a patient's state-law medical negligence claim against a health maintenance organization (HMO), was pre-empted by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),' shows that the doctrine of ERISA...

  • RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. v. MORAN et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Rush Prudential HMO Inc. v. Moral et al., case number 00-1021, argued on January 16, 2002 and decided on June 20, 2002. Petitioner denied respondent's request to have surgery by an unaffiliated specialist on the ground that the...

  • The Supreme Court Overturns the Second Circuit and Rules that SLUSA Preempts Holders' Claims. Stern, Warren R.; Waldman, Adir G.; Wolinsky, Marc // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q2, p1 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) preempts state court class actions on behalf of securities holders released on March 21, 2006. The Court held that the background, the text and the purpose of the preemption...

  • HABEAS CORPSE. Bruck, David; Harris, Leslie // New Republic;7/15/91-7/22/91, Vol. 205 Issue 3/4, p10 

    Reports on the United States Supreme Court's ruling that the federal courts cannot consider the appeal of Virginia death-row inmate Roger Coleman because his court-appointed lawyer was three-days late in filing a previous appeal with the Virginia Supreme Court. Inclination of the administration...

  • Complex Laws Can't Spell Judicial Respect. Lazarus, Richard // Environmental Forum;Jan/Feb2005, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p8 

    Alleges that the environmental law and environmental lawyers in the U.S. are not receiving judicial respect in courts as of January 2005. Views on several published federal court rulings on environmental law cases; Observation on the effect of the technical complexity of the environmental law...

  • "THIS HONORABLE COURT" J. A. G. // American Heritage;Jun1963, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p4 

    The article offers information about the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is at the top of the federal judiciary and is designed chiefly to settle arguments between states or matters beyond the scope of state courts. However, it has expanded its scope became an institution that shaped the...

  • Washington State Constitution Bars Student Prayer Groups, Court Rules.  // Education Week;9/4/1991, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p2 

    The article reports that a federal judge has ruled that the Washington State constitution prohibits student religious groups from meeting at public schools in the state. A ruling in a case filed against a Washington school district states that the constitution's ban on any secretarian influence...

  • WHEN THE SUPREME COURT DEPARTS FROM ITS TRADITIONAL FUNCTION. Colunga, Isaac J. // Valparaiso University Law Review;Fall2010, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p47 

    The article discusses the issue when the U.S. Supreme Court reverses the state court judgments which favor the state citizens in applying an expansive interpretation of federal law in 1970s. It reports that the Supreme Court overruled a state court's decision related to emergency aid doctrine....

  • U.S. High Court Blocks State Court HMO Suits, Supports ERISA Preemption. Bell, Allison // National Underwriter / P&C;6/28/2004, Vol. 108 Issue 25, p9 

    Reports on the issuance of a court ruling stating that patients cannot sue in state courts when their health maintenance organization refuse to pay for doctor-recommended medical care by the U.S. Supreme Court. Cases involved in the ruling; Contention of advocates of state laws on the right to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics