TITLE

PRIVATE BENEFITS WITHOUT CONTROL? MODERN CHAPTER 11 AND THE MARKET FOR CORPORATE CONTROL

AUTHOR(S)
Couwenberg, Oscar; Lubben, Stephen J.
PUB. DATE
September 2018
SOURCE
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law;2018, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p145
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Outside of bankruptcy, a board of directors' decision to take control rights away from existing shareholders and grant them to another is subject to heightened fiduciary duties. As the sale of control represents a kind of end game, shareholders have one last chance to realize the full value for their investment. In such a context, their interests warrant special protection. A similar sale of control can happen in a chapter 11 procedure when a bankruptcy plan revamps the capital structure of the firm. In such a restructuring of the firm, control rights can be newly created, redefined and redistributed to corporate stakeholders. As bankruptcy always implicates many more stakeholders than only shareholders, a sale of control thus implicates a wider array of control rights owners than a normal control transaction. However, in a chapter 11 procedure, fiduciary duties protecting interests of such owners of control rights do not arise and this creates the potential for agency misdeeds. We discuss three recent chapter 11 or 15 cases in which the bankruptcy plans led to a restructuring of the capital structures, redistributing control in the process. Our viewpoint is that in such complex restructuring processes, private benefits of control provide incentives to a select group of investors to twist the plan to their advantage. Our three cases show: 1) a lack of openness to other investors who are not part of the plan proposing classes; 2) that plans redistribute control via penny warrants, private placements, and other similar devices, shutting out other shareholders or diluting holdings significantly; and 3) a deal and fee structure that explicitly rewards specific groups and not others. We conclude that in chapter 11 procedures, a redistribution of benefits is possible to an extent not possible under state corporate law. However, as we discuss only three exemplary cases, caution is warranted at the moment as we cannot provide a full empirical picture of private benefits in chapter 11 and chapter 15 procedures.
ACCESSION #
137333270

 

Related Articles

  • Directors can owe a duty to individual shareholders. Kobrin, David // Accountancy;May2000, Vol. 125 Issue 1281, p102 

    The article discusses relationship between a company director and a shareholder. The headnote of the law report of the Chancery Division's well known decision in Percival v Wright states that the directors of a company are not trustees for individual shareholders and may purchase their shares...

  • THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR'S GOALS FOR CORPORATE LAW IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY.  // Delaware Journal of Corporate Law;2000, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p35 

    Focuses on the goals of institutional investors for the development of Delaware corporate law in the 21st century. Influence of investors on the global market development; Trends of corporate governance affecting institutional investors; Concerns over the global volatility and the impact of the...

  • Of Econometrics and Indeterminacy: A Study of Investors' Reactions to 'Changes' in Corporate Law. Weiss, Elliot J.; White, Lawrence J. // California Law Review;Mar1987, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p551 

    Discusses a study which examined the reaction of investors to the changes in corporate law in Delaware. Debate over corporate law implementation; Overview of market studies on the effects of reincorporation; Effects of changes in corporate law.

  • VAT. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Feb1997, Vol. 119 Issue 1242, p86 

    Reports that a High Court in Great Britain has decided that a written board resolution under the terms of the Companies Act 1948 was invalid. Conditions that makes the rule invalid; Case background; Validity of a resolution in writing signed by all directors who were entitled to receive notice...

  • Is There A Delaware Premium? Daines, Robert // Corporate Board;May/Jun2000, Vol. 21 Issue 122, p22 

    Focuses on the debate about whether Delaware's corporate law benefits shareholders or managers. Real premium to investors; Establishment of a specialized Chancery Court to resolve corporate law disputes; Research on Delaware law's effect on company value; Need for managers to avoid entrenching...

  • Shareholder Goals, Firm Goals and Firm Financing Decisions. Seitz, Neil // Financial Management (1972);Autumn82, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p20 

    The article focuses on compensation arrangements for executives in large U.S. firms. While models of the risk-return behavior of investors have gained wide acceptance in recent years, the same cannot be said for models of firm behavior. Although several important new theories have emerged,...

  • Looking at capital markets. Ochse, Gareth // Finweek;11/28/2013, p48 

    The article presents the author's views on corporate finance in South Africa. He defines corporate finance which can only be applied on large private companies with a turnover of at least 300 million rand. He discusses several factors why the corporate finance theory cannot be applied on all...

  • HETEROGENEOUS BELIEFS, MORAL HAZARD, AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE. Bigus, Jochen // Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR);Apr2003, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p136 

    This paper provides a hew approach to the theory of capital structure by emphasizing the issue that investors and entrepreneurs may have heterogeneous beliefs on future firm returns. Heterogeneous beliefs are possible even when there is symmetric information but individuals evaluate the same...

  • INTERDEPENDENT STRUCTURE OF DEBT CAPITALIZATION AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT IN THE MENA COUNTRIES. Zekri, Soulef // Journal of Business Studies Quarterly;2012, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p25 

    The results of this research tend to confirm that ownership structure has an effect on the conflicts between the majority and the minority shareholders through borrowing. It seems, however, that the context in which the studies were conducted determines the way of such impact. More precisely,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics