TITLE

Pa. measure protects converting mutuals

AUTHOR(S)
Katz, David M.
PUB. DATE
December 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;12/7/98, Vol. 102 Issue 49, p26
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the insurance legislative bill passed by the Pennsylvania Legislature that would protect mutual insurers from hostile takeovers as they convert to stock companies. Promotion of equal mental health coverage with other health benefits; Components of the bill.
ACCESSION #
1373328

 

Related Articles

  • NAII Reports Bills Adverse To Industry, Consumers Did Not Pass.  // Insurance Advocate;4/29/2002, Vol. 113 Issue 16, p20 

    Provides information on several bills that might harm insurers and policyholders in Nebraska.

  • AIA Hits California Bill That Would Restrict Insurers From Managing Exposure To Mold Claims.  // Insurance Advocate;4/29/2002, Vol. 113 Issue 16, p26 

    Focuses on the criticisms of the American Insurance Association on a bill that would restrict insurers from managing exposure to mold claims.

  • Model Law Targets Courts Regulating Insurance.  // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;9/1/2003, Vol. 107 Issue 35, p7 

    Focuses on the campaign of insurance companies to promote a model law setting procedures to handle occasions when court findings are at odds with state insurance regulations. Proposal of Indianapolis-based National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) for Fair Notice and Market...

  • 20th Century challenges Prop. 103 in Supreme Court. Haggerty, Alfred G. // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;1/2/95, Vol. 99 Issue 1, p2 

    Reports that Woodland Hills, California-based 20th Century Industries has petitioned the US Supreme Court to review the California Supreme Court's decision upholding the insurance commissioner's power to enforce proposition 103 and limit insurers to a 10 percent of return. Question of whether a...

  • LEGISLATIVE DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY TO INSURANCE REGULATORS: WHEN ARE THEY IMPROPER? Maroney, Patrick F. // Journal of Insurance Regulation;Dec83, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p246 

    Focuses on several issues regarding insurance regulators. Discussion of the source of authority of a regulator; Limitations restricting the exercise of a regulator's authority; Information on administrative agencies which provide federal regulation.

  • SEC And NASD Officials Reiterate VA Oversight And Compliance Warnings. Brostoff, Steven // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;6/30/2003, Vol. 107 Issue 26, p32 

    Reports on the need for regulatory compliance among U.S. insurance companies. Effective oversight of investment activities; Establishment of internal procedures and controls designed to ensure compliance; Tax benefits in tax-deferred plans.

  • Insurers Weigh In On Market Conduct. Connolly, Jim // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;1/26/2004, Vol. 108 Issue 3, p48 

    Reports that the National Conference of Insurance Legislators in Albany, New York is in the process of developing the Market Surveillance model act; Recommendations of insurers; Language of recommendations offered by insurers.

  • Subrogation.  // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;04/07/97 Supplement Directory, Vol. 101 Issue 14, p7 

    Provides a directory which consists of insurance companies involved in the processing of subrogated claims.

  • Calif. Looks To Mandate Insurer Investments. Howard, J.C. // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;04/26/99, Vol. 103 Issue 17, p5 

    Provides information on the bill, AB869, a proposed insurance legislation in California sponsored by Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Monterey Peninsula. Supporters of the bill; Amount collected by California insurers annually from policyholders; Comments from Barry Carmody, president of the...

  • Calif. Victory Does Not Let Insurers Off The Hook.  // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;03/20/2000, Vol. 104 Issue 12, p30 

    Reports on the success of insurance companies in California in convincing state voters to overturn a law that would have restored the right of accident victims to file bad-faith lawsuits against insurers. Significance of the win; Costs of the efforts; Implications to voters in California.

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics