TITLE

When Marketing Efforts Go Flat

AUTHOR(S)
Reddy, Venkateshwar K.; Olson, Eric M.; Slater, Stanley F.
PUB. DATE
May 2004
SOURCE
Marketing Management;May/Jun2004, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article focuses on the failed marketing strategies employed by Firestone's competitors, Michelin and Goodyear. Unlike some of the tire industry's most memorable feature-based ads, the Michelin ads focused on puppies. Simple scenes of small innocent children clad only in diapers sitting in the middle of a tire while an off-screen announcer mentions that with so much is riding on the tires. These ads have become industry icons and helped to firmly establish within consumers' minds that Michelin tires are about quality and safety. These messages implied that any caring person would recognize that the small differential in price was inconsequential when compared with the safety of a child or pet. In contrast, Goodyear's business slipped big time. Much of the blame has to go to simple mismanagement of those old-fashioned marketing issues of price, product, and promotion. One of the biggest blunders Goodyear appears to have made was in the area of pricing. Rather than holding the line on prices in an effort to lure traditional Firestone customers whose confidence had been shaken, Goodyear increased prices on some products by as much as 7% in early 2001 and then tacked on additional markups mid-year. The rationale behind these hefty price increases could only have been that buyers' perceptions of Goodyear were now significantly higher than their perception of Firestone and therefore large segments of the market would be willing to pay a premium for their product. But the problem with this logic is that failure by one firm in an industry does not translate into an instantaneous belief among consumers that its competitors' products are any better.
ACCESSION #
13468228

 

Related Articles

  • Big Three tyremakers fight for market share.  // Automotive Engineer;Sep97, Vol. 22 Issue 7, p8 

    Focuses on the competition between tyremakers Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. of the U.S., Michelin Tire Co. of France and Japan's Bridgestone Corp. for a global market share. Stance taken by Bridgestone for market build up; Share of the companies in their home markets; Range of tires introduced...

  • Dealership snapshot. Davis, Bruce // Tire Business;10/27/2008, Vol. 26 Issue 15, p26 

    The article focuses on the increasing number of retail tire outlets which are operated by North America' s 100 largest independent dealerships. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Corp. continues to be the most widely available brand among the top dealerships in this year's ranking. Second is Michelin at 74...

  • Pricing wars. Begin, Sherri // Rubber & Plastics News;5/14/2001, Vol. 30 Issue 21, p1 

    Reports the price hikes in passenger and light truck aftermarket tires in the U.S. Percentage of increase; Estimation on the market share of Michelin and Goodyear brands; Influence of brand and product on the percentage of increase.

  • Don't spare the spare. Crain, Keith // Automotive News;7/10/2000, Vol. 74 Issue 5883, p12 

    Comments on attempts to eliminate the need for a spare tire in the United States. Agreement between tiremakers Goodyear Tire and Michelin Tire to set a global standard for run-flat tires; Question on whether carmakers will accept a new automobile with no spare tire; Lack of need for a spare...

  • Tire company CEOs start global research program.  // Rubber World;Mar2007, Vol. 235 Issue 6, p9 

    The article offers news briefs relating to corporations and finance in the rubber industry. A meeting joined by chief executive officers (CEOs) from leading tire companies in the world to discuss their global research program was held in Los Angeles, California. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co....

  • Top 75 tire makers see higher revenue. Davis, Bruce // Rubber & Plastics News;9/17/2012, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p14 

    The article reports on the 22 percent increase of the total revenue for the world's 75 largest tire companies in 2011. It states that Bridgestone Corp. has maintained its top spot in the ranking for the fourth straight year and has recorded seven percent growth in 2011. The ranking is also...

  • And the winner is... Davis, Bruce // European Rubber Journal;Sep/Oct2014, Vol. 196 Issue 5, p0021 

    The article discusses the retention of the position of tire maker Bridgestone Corp. in the Global Top 75 ranking of tire sales. Group Michelin, Goodyear and Continental A.G. occupy the next three positions in a global market that declined slightly. Bridgestone's holdings in...

  • A year of recovery. Davis, Bruce // Rubber & Plastics News;9/5/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p0014 

    The article reports on the economic recovery in the global tire industry in 2010 depicted in the 20% growth in collective revenue of major tire manufacturers worldwide, after experiencing recession in 2008 and 2009. It says that Bridgestone Corp. has retained the number one stop in terms of 2010...

  • Treading where few broadline retailers would even dare.  // DSN Retailing Today;1/26/2004, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p56 

    Presents several tire products in several branches of Wal-Mart Inc. in the U.S. Assessment on the quality of the products manufactured by Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.; Affordability on the prices of the items; Durability of the tires distributed by Michelin Tire Co.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics