D.C. Mayor Signs Budget, But Vetoes Inspector General Provision

Vadum, Matthew
June 2004
Bond Buyer;6/16/2004, Vol. 348 Issue 31906, p36
Trade Publication
Reports that Washington, D.C. Mayor Anthony Williams signed the proposed $4.16 billion budget for the fiscal year that begins October 2004 but vetoed a provision related to the way the Office of the Inspector General's budget is determined each year. Vetoed provision would have given the district government the power to determine the office's level of appropriations; Line item veto power.


Related Articles

  • D.C. Mayor, Told He Has Line-Item Veto Powers, Weighs Budget Options. Vadum, Matthew // Bond Buyer;6/10/2004, Vol. 348 Issue 31902, p29 

    Reports on the consideration of Washington D.C. Mayor Anthony Williams to use his item veto on the proposed budget of the district. Prediction of the reaction of the council on the assertion of the mayor of his line item veto authority; Impact of a mayoral veto on the progress of the budget;...

  • Do governors get what they want?: An alternative examination of the line-item veto. Dearden, James A.; Husted, Thomas A. // Public Choice;Dec93, Vol. 77 Issue 4, p707 

    This paper reconsiders the impact of the governor's line-item veto on the state budget process. The governor's ability to obtain his or her most desired budget measures item veto effectiveness, rather than a smaller expenditure budget. The percentage difference between the final state budget and...

  • The Item Veto and Expenditure Restraint. Nice, David C. // Journal of Politics;May88, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p487 

    The presidential item veto has been proposed as a solution to the national government's persistent budget deficits. Part of the case for the item veto typically includes reference to its record at the state level. However, systematic analysis of the relationship between state item veto powers...

  • HASH BY THE BILLION! Vandenberg, A. H. // Saturday Evening Post;8/29/1936, Vol. 209 Issue 9, p10 

    Shares the author's views regarding issues about constitutional amendment in the U.S. Recommendations for the President to set an example and promote thrift spending by cutting down public expenditures; Contention for the necessity to give the executive branch the power to veto against a...

  • How to succeed at increasing spending without really trying: The balanced budget amendment .... Gabel, Matthew J.; Hager, Gregory L. // Public Choice;Jan2000, Vol. 102 Issue 1/2, p19 

    Focuses on the proposed line-item veto and balanced budget amendment for pork-barrel spending in the United States. Importance of line item veto; Role of the president in vetoing a bill; Proposals of institutional reforms.

  • Justices hear oral arguments about line-item veto act. Reynolds, Katherine M. // Bond Buyer;04/28/98, Vol. 324 Issue 30381, p4 

    Reports that the US Supreme Court has heard arguments on whether Congress has the constitutional right to give the president the power to veto a single spending or tax item in the budget. Doubts cast by Supreme Court justices during arguments in the case `Clinton et al v. City of New York et...

  • A line-item veto may be in president Clinton's future: McLaughlin, Abraham T.; Bandrapalli, Suman // Christian Science Monitor;11/10/95, Vol. 87 Issue 243, p2 

    Reports on the likely emergence of a consensus regarding budgetary veto rights of the president in a spending bill.

  • Wisconsin Gov. Revises Budget Bill. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;5/19/2008, Vol. 364 Issue 32881, p1 

    The article reports on the revision of budget repair bill by Governor Jim Doyle in Wisconsin. Doyle reshaped the bill using his veto pen to increase the number of spending cuts and lower the level of cash reserves. The revision includes tobacco refunding that proceeds earmarked to help eliminate...

  • Line-Item Veto: Why Wait? Berthoud, John // Human Events;3/20/2006, Vol. 62 Issue 10, p7 

    The article reflects on the Legislative Line-Item Veto Bill introduced by U.S. President George W. Bush that would enable him to freeze funds for a line item and require the Congress to oppose it. It argues that the Congress has been doubting the bill as the president only tries to shift the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics