TITLE

PROTECTED FROM POLITICOS

AUTHOR(S)
Umstead, R. Thomas
PUB. DATE
June 2004
SOURCE
Multichannel News;6/14/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 24, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Addresses the issue of government regulation of adult content on cable television in the U.S. Remarks from Ken Boenish, president of The Erotic Networks, on the security of adult programming; Benefits of indecency regulations for cable operators; Internal precautions taken by the adult programming sector to remain viable and safe to operators.
ACCESSION #
13407749

 

Related Articles

  • Vote Undercuts Kerry's Remarks. Hearn, Ted // Multichannel News;6/14/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 24, p36 

    Focuses on the inconsistency of U.S. Senator and 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry (D-Mass.) when it comes to his stand on the application of broadcast-indecency rules to cable television programming. Explanation offered by a Kerry Senate spokesman regarding the issue; Distinction between...

  • Case buoys cap scrappers. McConnell, Bill // Broadcasting & Cable;03/12/2001, Vol. 131 Issue 11, p35 

    Reports on a decision by a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to give cable television operators more freedom to merge with each other and to choose the channels they carry. Court's ruling that the United States Federal Communications Commission failed to justify its 30 percent cap on...

  • Must carry's silver lining. McAvoy, Kim // Broadcasting & Cable;05/12/97, Vol. 127 Issue 20, p86 

    Explains how some new cable television networks are using the must-carry law to penetrate the American market. Requirement for cable systems to carry local television stations; Arts & Antiques Network's use of the must-carry status of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania noncommercial station WYBE;...

  • Champagne, real pain. McClellan, Steve // Broadcasting & Cable;04/07/97, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p16 

    Reports on the US Supreme Court's decision upholding the 1992 law requiring cable system to carry all local broadcast signals. Broadcast stations benefitting from the decision; Negative impact on major networks planning to launch new networks; Decision as a legal and policy precedent in support...

  • Must carry's surprising survival. Trigoboff, Dan // Broadcasting & Cable;04/07/97, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p20 

    Reports that the US Supreme Court has upheld the 1992 federal law requiring cable television operators to carry local broadcast stations in the case `Turner v. FCC'. Highlights of the case; Court's dismissal of the cable's preference toward A-B switches; Need for Congress to resolve judgments...

  • What price must carry? Trigoboff, Dan // Broadcasting & Cable;04/07/97, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p28 

    Reports on mixed reactions from broadcasters and regulators and public interest on the US Supreme Court's decision upholding the 1992 federal law requiring cable television operators to carry local broadcast stations in the case `Turner v. FCC'. Potential battlefields for broadcasters and...

  • Increased cable cap in crossfire. Wallenstein, Andrew // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;2/18/2003, Vol. 377 Issue 19, pM-6 

    Focuses on the concerns raised due to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's consideration to increase cable television ownership capacity of operators in the country. Impact of hike in ownership on marketing services organization collusion; Decision given by the U.S. Court of Appeals...

  • Access to Cable Television: A Critique of the Affirmative Duty Theory of the First Amendment.  // California Law Review;Dec82, Vol. 70 Issue 6, p1393 

    Argues that the affirmative duty theory should not be extended beyond broadcasting to cable and that imposing a duty on cablecasters is contrary to the first amendment in the U.S. Law on cable television; Evolution of the affirmative duty theory in media regulation; Policy justifications for...

  • This is CNN.  // National Review;8/3/1998, Vol. 50 Issue 14, p16 

    This article reports on the retraction by Cable News Network (CNN), a cable television network of the U.S., of its accusation that U.S. special forces had used nerve gas on American defectors in Laos in 1970. CNN had handled this story. A similar case of journalistic malfeasance was handled by...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics