Vote Undercuts Kerry's Remarks

Hearn, Ted
June 2004
Multichannel News;6/14/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 24, p36
Focuses on the inconsistency of U.S. Senator and 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry (D-Mass.) when it comes to his stand on the application of broadcast-indecency rules to cable television programming. Explanation offered by a Kerry Senate spokesman regarding the issue; Distinction between over-the-air TV and cable progamming, according to Kerry; His approval of an amendment in the Senate Commerce Committee that would have automatically applied broadcast indecency rules to expanded basic cable programming.


Related Articles

  • A LA CARTE WILL GO AWAY--AGAIN. Paskowski, Marianne // Television Week;1/2/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p9 

    The article explores issues concerning the proposed a la carte system of TV broadcasting in the U.S. The system, believed to curb TV indecency in the country, will allow TV viewers to choose and pay for programs that they want. Cable programmers and multiple system operators have expressed their...

  • Shaping the 'Future of Video'. SMITH, J. J. // Government Video;Jul2012, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p4 

    The author reflects on the need to amend or repeal the U.S. Cable Act of 1992. He suggests that the amendment or repealment of the same is necessary in order to provide relief to the cable operators suffering from the existing regulations. He further discusses the impact of deregulation of cable...

  • How the Fight Over Indecency Threatens To Turn the Cable Industry Upside Down. Higgins, John M.; Bednarski, P. J. // Broadcasting & Cable;12/5/2005, Vol. 135 Issue 52, p14 

    The article deals with issues concerning the proposed broadcasting policy of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). FCC chairman Kevin Martin has proposed the à la carte system of broadcasting, where viewers could choose the channels they want to buy. Martin believe that the system...

  • Loss of must carry doesn't worry broadcasters. McAvoy, Kim // Broadcasting & Cable;5/23/94, Vol. 124 Issue 21, p58 

    Reports on the reaction of television broadcasters on the possible rejection of the must-carry provisions of the 1992 Cable Act by the Supreme Court. Use of retransmission consent to gain long-term carriage agreement; Types of broadcasters that will be affected by the rejection of the...

  • Case buoys cap scrappers. McConnell, Bill // Broadcasting & Cable;03/12/2001, Vol. 131 Issue 11, p35 

    Reports on a decision by a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to give cable television operators more freedom to merge with each other and to choose the channels they carry. Court's ruling that the United States Federal Communications Commission failed to justify its 30 percent cap on...

  • Must carry's silver lining. McAvoy, Kim // Broadcasting & Cable;05/12/97, Vol. 127 Issue 20, p86 

    Explains how some new cable television networks are using the must-carry law to penetrate the American market. Requirement for cable systems to carry local television stations; Arts & Antiques Network's use of the must-carry status of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania noncommercial station WYBE;...

  • Champagne, real pain. McClellan, Steve // Broadcasting & Cable;04/07/97, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p16 

    Reports on the US Supreme Court's decision upholding the 1992 law requiring cable system to carry all local broadcast signals. Broadcast stations benefitting from the decision; Negative impact on major networks planning to launch new networks; Decision as a legal and policy precedent in support...

  • Must carry's surprising survival. Trigoboff, Dan // Broadcasting & Cable;04/07/97, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p20 

    Reports that the US Supreme Court has upheld the 1992 federal law requiring cable television operators to carry local broadcast stations in the case `Turner v. FCC'. Highlights of the case; Court's dismissal of the cable's preference toward A-B switches; Need for Congress to resolve judgments...

  • What price must carry? Trigoboff, Dan // Broadcasting & Cable;04/07/97, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p28 

    Reports on mixed reactions from broadcasters and regulators and public interest on the US Supreme Court's decision upholding the 1992 federal law requiring cable television operators to carry local broadcast stations in the case `Turner v. FCC'. Potential battlefields for broadcasters and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics