Environmental Protection Agency

May 2004
National Wetlands Newsletter;May/Jun2004, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p31
Reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has required states in 2004 to update their water quality laws and meet mandates of the 2000 Beach Act. Federal health standards designed to protect beach users from water contamination; Adoption of uniform beach water monitoring and beach closing and warning practices.


Related Articles

  • Environmental Protection in Louisiana: An Historical Paradox. Colten, Craig // Southern Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the South;Fall/Winter2005, Vol. 12 Issue 3/4, p75 

    The article discusses the role of the Citizen's Access Unit of the Louisiana Department of Justice in environmental protection. The author states that protection for rice farmers from damages caused by oil field releases of brine to streams used as irrigation water was offered by Louisiana's...

  • SEEKING A SENSIBLE WATER POLICY. Bozek, C. Richard // Electric Perspectives;May/Jun2007, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p136 

    The author discusses the provisions of section 316(b) of the U.S. Clean Water Act. According to the author, Section 316(b) requires that cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. He stated that in 2004, the U.S....

  • Clean Water Act: Proposed Revisions to EPA Regulations to Clean Up Polluted Waters: RCED-00-206R.  // GAO Reports;6/21/2000, p1 

    Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the economic and compliance issues associated with two proposed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations to clean up polluted waters, focusing on: (1) the reasonableness of EPA's economic analyses for the two proposed regulations; and...

  • Shortcomings and Remedies for the Water Quality Improvement Programs of the United States--A Brief Summary. Hunter III, John S. // American Journal of Public Health;Apr1973, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p345 

    Current policies guiding the water pollution control programs in the United States are shown to be incapable of providing the desired end results. Available alternatives are presented and discussed.

  • EPA finalizes manure rules for CAFOs. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;11/24/2008, Vol. 14 Issue 15, p11 

    The article reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule requiring concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) to safely manage manure. The EPA estimates that the CAFO regulations will prevent 56 million pounds of phosphorus, 110 million pounds of nitrogen...

  • THIS MONTH IN HISTORY: JUNE 1969.  // Ecologist;Jul/Aug2006, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p4 

    The article offers information on what happened at the Cuyahoga River in Ohio on June 22, 1969. A spark from a passing train turned the Cuyahoga River in Ohio into a raging inferno, with flames reaching up to five stories high. Because of the accident, the U.S. Clean Water Act of 1972 was...

  • SACKETT V. EPA. Smith, Turner; Holden, Margaret // Harvard Environmental Law Review;2013, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p301 

    No abstract available.

  • EPA Revises SPCC Plan Regulations. Amandes, Christopher B.; Woodworth, Thomas C. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q3, p1 

    The article focuses on the final rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) amending the Oil Pollution Prevention regulations declared under the authority of Section 311 (j) of the Clean Water Act. It presents the summary of the significant changes made by the rule. EPA...

  • CASE SUMMARIES.  // Environmental Law (00462276);Summer2012, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p793 

    The article focuses on several U.S. court cases involving environmental law issues. Information is provided on the California court case Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles, which dealt with violations of the U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and Jensen...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics