Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Devereaux, P. J.; Heels-Ansdell, Diane; Lacchetti, Christina; Haines, Ted; Burns, Karen E. A.; Cook, Deborah J.; Ravindran, Nikila; Walter, S. D.; McDonald, Heather; Stone, Samuel B.; Patel, Rakesh; Bhandari, Mohit; Schünemann, Holger J.; Choi, Peter T. L.; Bayoumi, Ahmed M.; Lavis, John N.; Sullivan, Terrence; Stoddart, Greg; Guyatt, Gordon H.
June 2004
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;6/8/2004, Vol. 170 Issue 12, p1817
Academic Journal
Background: It has been shown that patients cared for at private for-profit hospitals have higher risk-adjusted mortality rates than those cared for at private not-for-profit hospitals. Uncer-tainty remains, however, about the economic implications of these forms of health care delivery. Since some policy-makers might still consider for-profit health care if expenditure savings were sufficiently large, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. Methods: We used 6 search strategies to identify published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. We masked the study results before teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. We confirmed data or obtained additional data from all but 1 author. For each study, we calculated the payments for care at private for-profit hospitals relative to private not-for- profit hospitals and pooled the results using a random ef-fects model. Results: Eight observational studies, involving more than 350 000 patients altogether and a median of 324 hospitals each, ful-filled our eligibility criteria. In 5 of 6 studies showing higher payments for care at private for-profit hospitals, the difference was statistically significant; in 1 of 2 studies showing higher payments for care at private not-for-profit hospitals, the differ-ence was statistically significant. The pooled estimate demon-strated that private for-profit hospitals were associated with higher payments for care (relative payments for care 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.07--1.33, p= 0.001). Interpretation: Private for-profit hospitals result in higher pay-ments for care than private not-for-profit hospitals. Evidence strongly supports a policy of not-for-profit health care delivery at the hospital level.


Related Articles

  • Psychiatric hospital ownership and performance. Mark, Tami L. // Journal of Human Resources;Summer96, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p631 

    Nonprofit organizations have been hypothesized as being preferable to for-profit organizations in markets characterized by asymmetric information, such as the market for mental health care services. This paper empirically examines whether ownership affects the quality of private psychiatric...

  • RELATIONSHIP OF DIABETES WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE-RELATED HOSPITALIZATION RATES, LENGTH OF STAY, AND CHARGES: ANALYSIS BY RACE/ETHNICITY, AGE, AND SEX. Cook, Curtiss B.; Hentz, Joseph G.; Miller, William J.; Circe Tsui; Naylor, Dorothy B.; Ziemer, David C.; Waller, Lance A. // Ethnicity & Disease;Autumn2007, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p714 

    Objective: Determine relationship of diabetes with risk of cardiovascular disease hospitalizations and the effect on hospital length of stay and charges. Design: A cross-sectional analysis of Georgia hospital discharge data for 1998 through 2001. Patients: Patients hospitalized principally with...

  • The Chikungunya Epidemic on La Réunion Island in 2005-2006: A Cost-of-Illness Study. Soumahoro, Man-Koumba; Boelle, Pierre-Yves; Gaüzere, Bernard-Alex; Atsou, Kokuvi; Pelat, Camille; Lambert, Bruno; Ruche, Guy La; Gastellu-Etchegorry, Marc; Renault, Philippe; Sarazin, Marianne; Yazdanpanah, Yazdan; Flahault, Antoine; Malvy, Denis; Hanslik, Thomas // PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases;Jun2011, Vol. 5 Issue 6, p1 

    BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the impact of chikungunya on health costs during the epidemic that occurred on La Réunion in 2005-2006. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: From data collected from health agencies, the additional costs incurred by chikungunya in terms of...

  • R.Ph.s guarded over changes to inpatient payment system. Vecchione, Anthony // Drug Topics;6/19/2006, Vol. 150 Issue 12, pHSE8 

    The article features the proposed changes to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) in the U.S. The period for public comments regarding the revision has already ended in June 12, 2006 and the rule will be published in the later part of the year. The revision aims to improve the...

  • Is the price right? Fong, Tony // Modern Healthcare;6/14/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 24, p8 

    Discusses the result of a study conducted by the Center for Studying Health System Change in Washington, D.C. regarding the trend for hospital prices in the U.S. in 2003. Percentage of increase in hospital prices; Reasons behind the increase in hospital prices; Information on the percentage of...

  • NOW OPERATING TOGETHER. Mchunu, Sandile // Finweek;8/9/2006, p40 

    The article reports on the step taken by Discovery Health in inviting Medi-Clinic to help compile a new hospital rating index for 2007 after facing criticism from healthcare providers in South Africa. Ronnie van der Merwe, who compiled Medi-Clinic's annual report, is willing to continue working...

  • Putting a price on care. Benko, Laura B. // Modern Healthcare;2/14/2005, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p25 

    Focuses on the formation of the California Healthcare Coalition plans that will conduct in-dept research into hospital's pricing practices and at the same time attempting to negotiate directly with hospitals to reduce inpatient costs and improve quality of care. Manner in which the coalition is...

  • Pharmacists shrug as hospital charges are posted. Gebhart, Fred // Drug Topics;4/18/2005, Vol. 149 Issue 8, pHSE12 

    This article reports on the reaction of pharmacists over the move taken by states and health plans to post hospital charges for public scrutiny in the U.S. The idea of comparative price information for hospitals grew out of the consumer movement. The consensus was that if consumers have access...

  • 'For Profit' Hospitals Charge More Than Counterparts.  // Risk Management (00355593);Apr86, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p114 

    This article states that for-profit chain hospitals charged 22 percent more per admission than did their not-for-profit counterparts, according to a study published in the January 1985 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. The study also found that nearly 90 percent of the cost...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics