TITLE

The Murky Future of the Clean Water Act after SWANCC: Using a Hydrological Connection Approach to Saving the Clean Water Act

AUTHOR(S)
Mank, Bradford C.
PUB. DATE
December 2003
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p811
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In 2001, the Supreme Court decided Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC). In this five-to-four decision, the Court held that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) lacked the authority under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) to regulate "isolated" intrastate wetlands and waters that serve as habitat for migratory birds. The Court found the FWPCA's jurisdiction is limited to navigable waters and non-navigable waters that have a "significant nexus" to navigable waters, such as wetlands adjacent to navigable waters. However, the Court did not clearly define which adjacent wetlands and tributaries are within the scope of the FWPCA, generating considerable uncertainty about the FWPCA's jurisdiction. Some courts and commentators read SWANCC broadly to limit the FWPCA's application to only navigable waters and non-navigable wetlands and tributaries that immediately abut navigable waters. Other courts read SWANCC narrowly to mean that the FWPCA does not reach isolated, non-navigable waters that have no connection to navigable waters, but that its jurisdiction does reach inland waters or wetlands that have any hydrological or ecological connection to navigable waters. This Article proposes an intermediate position that requires that non-navigable waters contribute more than a mere hydrological connection or drop of water to navigable water to come within the FWPCA's jurisdiction, but also rejects the view that adjacent wetlands and tributaries must directly abut navigable waters to constitute "waters of the United States." The Article concludes that courts should interpret the Act to include any non-navigable waters, wetlands, or tributaries that possess a significant hydrological nexus with navigable waters.
ACCESSION #
13108224

 

Related Articles

  • 'Impinging On The States'? We Don't Think So. Kusler, Jon // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p55 

    Comments on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) versus Army Corps of Engineers, which allowed the Army Corps of Engineers to claim jurisdiction pursuant to the Migratory Bird Rule over the ponds and mudflats at issue. ...

  • A busy year. Nevel, Bonnie // National Wetlands Newsletter;Winter2003/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p2 

    Comments on developments in the U.S. related to wetlands, courts and the Corps of Engineers as of December 2003. Courts' interpretation of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case "Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers"; Lower court's ruling...

  • No Need For EPA To Act After Court Ruling. Austin, Jay // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p52 

    Comments the proposal of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency for a post-Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) versus U.S. Army Corps of Engineers rule-making to redefine Waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act. Argument taken...

  • Judicial, Administrative, and Congressional Responses to SWANCC. Liebesman, Lawrence R. // National Wetlands Newsletter;Winter2003/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p1 

    Examines judicial, administrative and congressional responses to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in "Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers' (SWANCC). Evaluation of the scope and reach of the government's regulatory authority over navigable waters...

  • Filling the SWANCC void. Nevel, Bonnie // National Wetlands Newsletter;Jul/Aug2002, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p2 

    Focuses on the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the 'Solid Waste Agency v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' case on the regulatory authority of various states on their wetlands. Wetland program models across the country; Incorporation of wetland protection into water quality...

  • Supreme Court Guts Clean Water Act Protection of "Isolated" Wetlands Used by Migratory Birds. Brax, Jeff // Ecology Law Quarterly;2001, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p543 

    Discusses the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court decision on the case between Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County in Illinois and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which involved wetland habitats of migratory birds under the Clean Water Act. Description of the case and its precedents;...

  • The 'Chicken Little' Syndrome. Lucas, Ronda Azevedo // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p56 

    Addresses the implications of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus Army Corps of Engineers decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which centers on the protection of wetlands and interstate waters. Legal principles behind the case; Actions which strongly refute the doomsday...

  • The Ducks Stop Here. Rabkin, Jeremy // American Spectator;Mar2001, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p14 

    Discusses the decision of the Supreme Court in the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Country v. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the creation of a solid waste disposal site in the Chicago suburbs. Facts of the case; Basis of the court's decision; Significance of the decision.

  • SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK COUNTY v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al., case number 99-1178, argued on October 31, 2000 and decided on January 9, 2001. The original interpretation made by the U.S. Army Corps of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics