Arizona Using Gans to Help to Meet Highway Needs

Williamson, Richard
April 2004
Bond Buyer;4/28/2004, Vol. 348 Issue 31872, p28
Trade Publication
Reports on the need for new roads and highways in Arizona. Use of grant anticipation notes backed by federal transportation dollars to speed construction; Amount taken by the state Board of Transportation to market to raise funds for a variety of projects; Role of Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. in handling the deal.


Related Articles

  • Federal Highway Funding by Program and Type of Roadway, With Related Safety Data: GAO-01-836R.  // GAO Reports;7/16/2001, p1 

    The National Association of Counties contends that rural roads do not receive the level of funding needed to make these roads safer. Rural local roads, which account for more than half of the 8.2 million miles of roadways in the United States, had the highest rate of fatalities per vehicle mile...

  • Senate adds $11.2 billion to highway bill funding.  // Concrete Products;Jun2005, Vol. 108 Issue 6, p9 

    Report on the approval of the proposed additional funds for highways and transit under the TEA-21 reauthorization bill by the U.S. Senate. Proposal of the additional funds by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley and Ranking Member Max Baucus; Expiry date of the reauthorization...

  • TxDOT's Record Roadwork. Watts, Jim // Bond Buyer;08/04/2009, Vol. 369 Issue 33160, p9 

    The article reports on the expenditure for road projects in Texas. According to state Department of Transportation officials, Texas will spend a record 5.9 billion dollars on road projects in fiscal year 2010. Another 5 billion dollars will be spent in fiscal year 2011 as the agency receives...

  • Growing Pains for Metropolitan Planning. Heminger, Steve // Transportation Quarterly;Summer2001, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p7 

    The article addresses criticisms against metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), outfits spread across the U.S. designed to serve as forums for local spending decisions under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Gloomy assessments of MPOs were made in separate...

  • Kansas Slashes Highway Spending as Revenues Crash. Watts, Jim // Bond Buyer;11/14/2008, Vol. 366 Issue 33004, p5 

    The article reports on the suspension of approximately $200 million of anticipated highway construction contracts by the Kansas Department of Transportation in Kansas. It was due to concerns that actual and expected declines in state and federal funding impair its ability to complete the work....

  • House passes TEA LU; state funding apportionments omitted.  // Pit & Quarry;Apr2005, Vol. 97 Issue 10, p34 

    Reports on the U.S. House of Representatives' passage of the Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (TEA LU) in March 2005. Provision of guaranteed funding for highways, transit and safety programs over the term of the bill; Use of funds for pavement materials research; Adoption of a...

  • Highway, Transit Programs Look Like Winners. Ichniowski, Tom // ENR: Engineering News-Record;9/24/2007, Vol. 259 Issue 11, p105 

    The article presents an update on the progress of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) appropriations bill for 2008. The Senate measure provides $41.2 billion for the highway obligation ceiling, which is $1 billion more than what the House approved for 2008 and 5 percent above the 2007...

  • State DOTs Have More Certainty With FAST Act. Parsons, Jim // ENR: Engineering News-Record;11/7/2016, Vol. 277 Issue 14, p46 

    The article reports that the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act has provided most U.S. state transportation agencies with funding certainty for their transportation projects. Topics discussed include the project planning and implementation procedure under the FAST Act considered...

  • Federal-Aid Highways: FHWA Needs a Comprehensive Approach to Improving Project Oversight: GAO-05-173. Siggerud, Katherine // GAO Reports;1/31/2005, p1 

    The federal-aid highway program provides over $25 billion a year to states for highway and bridge projects, often paying 80 percent of these projects' costs. The federal government provides funding for and oversees this program, while states largely choose and manage the projects. Ensuring that...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics