TITLE

Cross-border bank insolvency:Legal implications in the case of banks operating in different jurisdictions in Latin America

AUTHOR(S)
Lastra, Rosa María
PUB. DATE
April 2004
SOURCE
Journal of International Banking Regulation;Apr2004, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p201
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper focuses on the issue of bank liquidation from an international perspective and discusses the legal implications of the liquidation of banks with branches and subsidiaries in different jurisdictions. The regional scope of the paper is Latin America, though references to EU and US law are also included. The paper is divided into six sections. The first section provides an introduction to the subject. The next section broadly discusses the options available to the authorities to deal with failed banks (liquidation or rehabilitation). The third section deals with the international, regional and bilateral rules regarding issues of cross-border insolvency. Special attention is given to the Montevideo Treaties and the Bustamante Conventions as relevant treaty developments in this field in Latin America. This section also covers a brief analysis of international law principles applicable to cross-border insolvency. The fourth section examines the work of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision with regard to the international regulation of branches and subsidiaries. It also presents some observations with regard to the closure of a multinational bank. This is followed by a section that surveys the regulation of branches, subsidiaries and joint ventures in some Latin American countries. This section is complemented by three appendices at the end of the paper which summarise the legislation applicable to foreign branches and subsidiaries and to local branches and subsidiaries overseas in six jurisdictions: Peru, Chile, Venezuela, Colombia, Brazil and Argentina. A further appendix (Appendix 4) analyses the powers of supervisors, in particular with regard to the liquidation of banks, in these six jurisdictions. The final section presents the example of the Brazilian legislation and practice to deal with the problems (including possible liquidation)of foreign branches and subsidiaries in the country as well as the problems (including possible liquidation) of a...
ACCESSION #
12876463

 

Related Articles

  • Extent of State Sanction of Branch Banking.  // Congressional Digest;Mar1926, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p84 

    States in which branch banking is permitted may be divided into two classes, those which specifically authorize branch banking by law and those in which the State authorities in the exercise of their discretionary powers permit some form of branch banking to be carried on. The following...

  • States fighting foreign banks would lose by winning. Isaac, William M. // American Banker;8/28/1997, Vol. 162 Issue 166, p4 

    Opinion. Focuses on the proposed legislation that would place branches of foreign banks on the same footing as branches licensed by the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Model legislation used in the proposal; Issues facing foreign banks in establishing branches; Key provisions of...

  • New York opens door to Connecticut banks. Soule, Alexander // Fairfield County Business Journal;8/4/2008, Vol. 47 Issue 31, p5 

    The article reports on the new law enacted by New York, which allows Connecticut-chartered banks to open new branches in the state. New York has signed a compact that permits the banks based in New Jersey and Pennsylvania to expand into the state, without the need to submit to regulatory...

  • Groups pushing for branching rights in Georgia point to bankless counties.  // American Banker;10/5/1995, Vol. 160 Issue 192, p6 

    Points out the absence of a single bank branch in two counties in Georgia. Likelihood of reforming of the state's bank branching law; Granting of permission to banks to open a branch in counties without any banking services.

  • Congressmen Discuss McFadden Bill. Con. Lozier, Ralph H. // Congressional Digest;Mar1926, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p89 

    The article focuses on the views of the author on the U.S. McFadden banking bill. The author is opposed to this banking bill and to branch banking. He says that it is an evil in which you cannot compromise without suffering irreparable injury. Those who are sponsoring this bill admit that branch...

  • BRANCH BANKING AND THE AVAILABILITY OF BANKING SERVICES IN METROPOLITAN AREAS. Seaver, William L.; Fraser, Donald R. // Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis;Mar1979, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p153 

    The article addresses the question of whether or not those states with branch banking have more banking offices per person that those states with unit banks. A study is performed using cluster analysis in metropolitan areas. The article discusses the methodology, the evidence from the clusters,...

  • STATE BRANCHING RESTRICTIONS AND THE AVAILABILITY OF BRANCHING SERVICES. LANZILLOTTI, R. F.; SAVING, T. R. // Journal of Money, Credit & Banking (Ohio State University Press);Nov69, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p778 

    The article investigates the impact of U.S. state branching restrictions on the banking system, with a particular emphasis on how such restrictions influence the number of banking offices. The author develops expressions for supply and demand for time deposits, and incorporates them into a model...

  • Illinois bankers support interstate de novo branching.  // North Western Financial Review;3/1/2004, Vol. 189 Issue 5, p16 

    Reports on the support to interstate de novo branching by the Illinois bankers. Results of a survey by the Community Bankers Association (CBAI) in favor of the idea; Breaking of the 30 year old history of working to limit branching by banks; Permission to the banks headquartered in other states...

  • Ga. bankers confound lawmakers by taking both sides on branching. Rhoads, Christopher // American Banker;12/7/1995, Vol. 160 Issue 235, p7 

    Reports on the controversy over the intrastate branching law in Georgia to be discussed in the legislative session of state legislators in January 1996. State's Community Bankers Association's opposition to statewide branching; Georgia Bankers Association's support for branching; Both groups'...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics