TITLE

Mosaid Sees Markman Order

PUB. DATE
March 2004
SOURCE
Electronic News;3/29/2004, Vol. 50 Issue 13, pN.PAG
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on a claims construction order issued by William J. Martini, a New Jersey district court judge, in the patent infringement lawsuit filed by Mosaid Technologies against Samsung Electronics and Infineon Technologies. Claim terms ruled by Martini; Opinion of Mosaid CEO George Cwynar on the ruling; Determination of the issue of whether the Samsung and Infineon dynamic random-access memory products infringe on Mosaid's patents.
ACCESSION #
12858869

 

Related Articles

  • Court Rules Infineon Does Not Infringe 6 Mosaid Patents, 1 to Go.  // Electronic News;4/11/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 15, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the ruling of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey regarding a patent case between Mosaid Technologies Inc. and Infineon Technologies Inc. in 2005. Allegations of patent infringement against Infineon; Information several products that Mosaid provided an actual...

  • Mosaid Allowed to Appeal Summary Judgment.  // Electronic News;11/7/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 45, pN.PAG 

    This article reports that U.S. District Judge Fogel has issued a stipulation and order granting Mosaid Technologies' motion for entry of final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) and staying remaining issues in the case as of November 2005. On August 29, Mosaid had filed a motion in its patent...

  • Court Calendar Delivered to Mosaid.  // Electronic News;7/4/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 27, pN.PAG 

    Focuses on a proposed schedule for the proceedings of a patent lawsuit filed by Mosaid Technologies Inc. against Infineon Technologies by a Texas court. Information on the court order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Leonard Davis which set out a detailed schedule for the proceedings; Number...

  • Infineon and Mosaid: 1 Patent Down, 9 to Go.  // Electronic News;5/31/2004, Vol. 50 Issue 22, pN.PAG 

    Reports on an agreement between Mosaid Technologies and Infineon on the removal of a delay locked loop (DLL) patent issue from a litigation between the companies. Details of the DLL patent; Impact of the agreement on the litigation; Reasons for the decision of Mosaid not to include the patent...

  • CAFC Rules That Strict Claims Construction Is Necessary in 'Best Mode' Technology Case. Brown, Cliston // Corporate Legal Times;Dec2000, Vol. 10 Issue 109, p82 

    Reports the victory of Nortel Networks Corp. over Samsung Electronics Co. in a patent infringement dispute in the United States. Overturn of a district court ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Use of a Nortel process without a license; Need of disclosing the best mode of...

  • Samsung supports delay of second Apple infringement trial. Elmer-DeWitt, Philip // Fortune.com;11/14/2013, p1 

    The article reports efforts by electronics company Samsung to delay a second patent infringement trial by computer company Apple against the Samsung Galaxy S3 smartphone and mentions Judge Lucy Koh suggested in October 2013 that the March 2014 trial be put on hold while Samsung appeals the...

  • Samsung To Pay Apple Millions.  // Micro Mart;5/15/2014, Issue 1311, p36 

    The article reports on the 71 million U.S. dollars to be paid by South Korean electronics firm Samsung to American technology company Apple for infringing a couple of its patents based on the verdict made by a California jury.

  • Apple won, so what now for designers? Mannion, Patrick // EDN;Sep2012, Vol. 57 Issue 15, p10 

    The author discusses the impact of the verdict in the Apple v. Samsung patent-infringement case for designers and innovators. The verdict, which Apple won with a 1.049 billion U.S. dollar award, reportedly drew rants against the alleged ineptitude of the U.S. patent office, the...

  • Apple Wins Patent Lawsuit Against Samsung in Japan.  // WiMAX Monthly Newsletter;Jun2013, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p12 

    The article reports that the lawsuit filed by the computer technology firm Apple Inc. at the Tokyo District Court in Japan has won against the electronics company Samsung which regards to the infringement of bounce-back patent.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics