First experiences with the da Vinciâ„¢ operating robot in thoracic surgery

Bodner, J.; Wykypiel, H.; Wetscher, G.; Schmid, T.
May 2004
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;May2004, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p844
Academic Journal
Objectives: The da Vinci™ surgical robotic system was purchased at our institution in June 2001. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the applicability of the da Vinci™ operation robot for general thoracic procedures. Methods: The da Vinci™ surgical system consists of a console connected to a surgical arm cart, a manipulator unit with two instrument arms and a central arm to guide the endoscope. The surgical instruments are introduced via special ports and attached to the arms of the robot. The surgeon, sitting at the console, triggers highly sensitive motion sensors that transfer the surgeon''s movements to the tip of the instruments. The so-called ‘EndoWrist™ technology’ offers seven degrees of movement, thus exceeding the capacity of a surgeon''s hand in open surgery. We evaluated the role of the robot for several thoracic procedures such as thymectomies, fundoplications, esophageal dissections, resection of mediastinal masses and a pulmonary lobectomy. Results: A total of 10 thymectomies, 16 fundoplications, 4 esophageal dissections, 5 extirpations of benign mediastinal masses and 1 right lower lobectomy was performed with the robot. One resection of a paravertebral neurogenic tumor had to be converted due to surgical problems. A lesion to a left recurrent laryngeal nerve caused transient hoarseness after the extirpation of an ectopic parathyroid in the aortopulmonary window in one patient. The postoperative courses were uneventful and patients were discharged between postoperative days 3 and 8 (with the exception of patients who underwent dissection for esophageal cancer and the patient with conversion to an open access). Conclusions: Advanced general thoracic procedures can be performed safely with the da Vinci™ robot allowing precise dissection in remote and difficult-to-reach areas. This benefit becomes evident most elegantly in thymectomies, which at our institution have become a routine procedure with the robot. The rigid anatomy of the chest seems to be an ideal condition for robotic surgery. A major limitation for robotic surgery is the lack of more appropriate instruments. This disadvantage becomes most evident in pulmonary lobectomies.


Related Articles

  • Give Patients a Choice. Sadler, Carolyn // ONS Connect;Nov2007, Vol. 22 Issue 11, p14 

    The article shares a reader's strategies in helping patients quit smoking. According to the reader, she has worked in thoracic surgery for 23 years, and the surgeon she worked for will not operate on a patient who needs surgery if he is actively smoking. She adds that there are complications...

  • Cardiothoracic surgery remains an attractive career in the United Kingdom. West, Douglas; Westaby, Stephen; Baig, Kamran // European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;Mar2016, Vol. 49 Issue 3, p1019 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Recruitment to UK cardiothoracic surgery in the era of public outcome reporting," by S. Westaby and colleagues in the 2015 issue.

  • THORACIC SURGERY.  // New York;6/14/2004, Vol. 37 Issue 21, p93 

    Presents information about the top thoracic surgeons in New York. Specialization; Contact information.

  • Anwendung des daVinci-Robotersystems in der Thoraxchirurgie. Ismail, M.; Swierzy, M.; Ulrich, M.; Rückert, J.C. // Der Chirurg;Aug2013, Vol. 84 Issue 8, p643 

    Introduction: The latest technical developments of minimally invasive thoracic surgery are characterized by robotic-assisted operative procedures. Robotic-assisted thymectomy is the most advanced method in this field. Methods: A systematic literature search (PubMed, Medline) was carried out and...

  • Methods of removing tube thoracostomies.  // American Family Physician;3/1/1995, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p916 

    Highlights the study conducted by Davis et al, published in the November 1994 issue of the `Journal of the American College of Surgeons.' Comparison of two methods of chest tube removal for differences in total duration of chest tube use, complications and the time required to remove the chest...

  • CMDATS年会专题. 我国胸外科发展现状分析. 张逊 // Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer;Jul2014, Vol. 17 Issue 7, p518 

    No abstract available.

  • Pulmonary Resection in the 21st Century. Cerfolio, Robert J. // Texas Heart Institute Journal;2012, Vol. 39 Issue 6, p848 

    The article focuses on the application of robotics in pulmonary resection. It outlines the advantages of robotic thoracic surgery over video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Information is presented on the results of the study which investigated robotic pulmonary resection in patients with...

  • Robotic lobectomy: tips, pitfalls and troubleshooting. Kocher, Gregor J.; Schmid, Ralph A.; Melfi, Franca M.A. // European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;Dec2014, Vol. 46 Issue 6, pe136 

    The robotic approach in thoracic surgery has rapidly gained popularity in recent years. As with the introduction of any new technology, this warrants not only adaptation of the operative technique itself, but also the evolution of appropriate troubleshooting strategies. A selected number of...

  • Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a system review and meta-analysis. Liangze Zhang; Shugeng Gao // International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Medicine;2015, Vol. 8 Issue 10, p17804 

    The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the perioperative morbidity and mortality outcomes of roboticassisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with open thoracic surgery (OTS) for patients with lung cancer. We searched articles indexed in the Pubmed and Sciencedirect published as of July 2015 that...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics