TITLE

STANDING, LEGAL INJURY WITHOUT HARM, AND THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE DIVIDE

AUTHOR(S)
GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM S. C.
PUB. DATE
November 2017
SOURCE
New York University Law Review;Nov2017, Vol. 92 Issue 5, p1571
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Legal injury without harm is a common phenomenon in the law. Historically, legal injury without harm was actionable for at least nominal damages, and sometimes other remedies. The same is true today of many "traditional" private rights, for which standing is uncontroversial. Novel statutory claims, on the other hand, routinely face justiciability challenges: Defendants assert that plaintiffs' purely legal injuries are not injuries "in fact," as required to establish an Article III case or controversy. "Injury in fact" emerges from the historical requirement of "special damages" to enforce public rights, adapted to a modern procedural world. The distinction between public and private rights is unstable, however, with the result that many novel statutory harms are treated as "public," and thus subject to exacting justiciability analysis, when they could easily be treated as "private" rights for which legal injury without harm is sufficient for standing. Public and private act as rough proxies for "novel" and "traditional," with the former subject to more judicial skepticism. Applying "injury in fact" this way is hard to defend as a constitutional necessity, but might make sense prudentially, depending on the novelty and legal source of value for the harm. Taxonomizing these aspects of "harm" suggests that, even with unfamiliar harms, judicial discretion over value lessens the need for exacting injury analysis.
ACCESSION #
126275508

 

Related Articles

  • Block That Judgment. Sullum, Jacob // Reason;Nov2010, Vol. 42 Issue 6, p12 

    The article reports on the approval of the Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage (SPEECH) Act in July 2010 in the U.S. which is aimed to discourage libel tourism.

  • Feds put heat on Charter. Higgins, John M. // Broadcasting & Cable;8/19/2002, Vol. 132 Issue 34, p12 

    Reports the issues the federal prosecutors and Charter Communications company regarding the accounting issues of Charter in the U.S. Delivery of the subpoena to the Charter; Levels of connected and disconnected subscribers; Capitalization policies of the company; Effects of the capital...

  • Charter: Feds Want Documents. Farrell, Mike // Multichannel News;8/19/2002, Vol. 23 Issue 33, p2 

    Reports on the subpoena from the U.S. grand jury to Charter Communications Inc. regarding the method of company in counting subscribers. Statement from senior vice president David Andersen of Charter on the issue; Request from the jury on the documents relating Charter's current and...

  • Charter Hit With Wire Fee Suit. Haugsted, Linda // Multichannel News;1/27/2003, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p8 

    Reports on the class action lawsuit filed against Charter Communications Inc.'s wire-maintenance and set-top policies. Appreciation of the lawsuit by South Carolina-based judge; Criticism of Charter's wire-maintenance plan by attorney of plaintiffs Michael Spears.

  • LEGAL BRIEFS.  // Editor & Publisher;Sep2012, Vol. 145 Issue 9, p10 

    This section offers news briefs related to legal matters in the U.S. A jury has awarded Phillip Webb, an assistant high school principal, three million U.S. dollars in damages in a libel suit against the newspaper "Virginian-Pilot." A lawsuit was filed by the "Los Angeles Times" and "Sacramento...

  • Charter Seeks Santa Cruz Appeal. Haugsted, Linda // Multichannel News;10/28/2002, Vol. 23 Issue 43, p16 

    Focuses on the petition of the Charter Communications Inc. before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, California. Contents of the petition filed before the court; Reason for filing the petition.

  • Ads subtracted. Barthold, Jim // Telephony;10/29/2001, Vol. 241 Issue 18, p28 

    Reports on the ruling by United States District Court Judge Catherine D. Perry on the lawsuit filed by Charter Communications against SBC Communications on August 28, 2001. Excerpts from Perry's ruling; Overview of the advertisement of SBC against cable modem services.

  • Hot mom hot after firing over nude photo. Ceniceros, Roberto; Dunning, Matt; Harrison, Sheena; Veysey, Sarah; Zolkos, Rodd // Business Insurance;10/21/2013, Vol. 47 Issue 21, p0054 

    The article reports on a lawsuit filed by Jessica Zelinske, a mother from Minnesota, against her employer Charter Communications for firing her from her advertising sales job after appearing nude on the cover of a Hot Housewives edition of "Playboy Magazine."

  • Corporate initiative. McDermott, Ted // Missoula Independent;6/26/2014, Vol. 25 Issue 26, p8 

    The article focuses on the withdrawal of Initiative 172, a ballot initiative which will reduce tax burden of its sponsor Charter Communications Inc., a provider of telephone, internet and cable services. It mentions that Charter sued the state of Montana to have its tax classification revised....

  • Charter sues MediaOne over Twin Cities. Colman, Price // Broadcasting & Cable;02/23/98, Vol. 128 Issue 8, p54 

    Reports that a lawsuit forcing MediaOne Group to sell its Minnesota cable systems to Charter Communications was filed in circuit court in St. Louis, Missouri. What prompted Charter to file the lawsuit; Circumstances surrounding the lawsuit; Information on MediaOne-Charter contract; Comments...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics