November 2017
New York University Law Review;Nov2017, Vol. 92 Issue 5, p1399
Academic Journal
Few decisions in the criminal justice process are as consequential as the determination of bail. Indeed, recent empirical research finds that pre-trial detention imposes substantial long-term costs on defendants and society. Defendants who are detained before trial are more likely to plead guilty, less likely to be employed, and less likely to access social safety net programs for several years after arrest. Spurred in part by these concerns, critics of the bail system have urged numerous jurisdictions to adopt bail reforms, which have led to growing momentum for a large-scale transformation of the bail system. Yet supporters of the current system counter that pre-trial detention reduces flight and pre-trial crime--recognized benefits to society--by incapacitating defendants. Despite empirical evidence in support of both positions, however, advocates and critics of the current bail system have generally ignored the real trade-offs associated with detention. This Article provides a broad conceptual framework for how policymakers can design a better bail system by weighing both the costs and benefits of pre-trial detention--trade-offs that are historically grounded in law, but often disregarded in practice. I begin by presenting a simple taxonomy of the major categories of costs and benefits that stem from pre-trial detention. Building from this taxonomy, I conduct a partial cost-benefit analysis that incorporates the existing evidence, finding that the current state of pre-trial detention is generating large social losses. Next, I formally present a framework that accounts for heterogeneity in both costs and benefits across defendants, illustrating that detention on the basis of "risk" alone can lead to socially suboptimal outcomes. In the next part of the Article, I present new empirical evidence showing that a cost-benefit framework has the potential to improve accuracy and equity in bail decision-making, where currently bail judges are left to their own heuristics and biases. Using data on criminal defendants and bail judges in two urban jurisdictions, and exploiting variation from the random assignment of cases to judges, I find significant judge differences in pre-trial release rates, the assignment of money bail, and racial gaps in release rates. While there are any number of reasons why judges within the same jurisdiction may vary in their bail decisions, these results indicate that judges may not be all setting bail at the socially optimal level. The conceptual framework developed in this Article also sheds light on the ability of recent bail reforms to increase social welfare. While the empirical evidence is scant, electronic monitoring holds promise as a welfare-enhancing alternative to pre-trial detention. In contrast, application of the conceptual framework cautions against the expanding use of risk-assessment instruments. These instruments, by recommending the detention of high-risk defendants, overlook the possibility that these high-risk defendants may also be "high-harm" such that they are most adversely affected by a stay in jail. Instead, I recommend that jurisdictions develop "net benefit" assessment instruments by predicting both risk and harm for each defendant in order to move closer toward a bail system that maximizes social welfare.


Related Articles

  • MENTAL DISORDER AND CRIMINAL LAW. MORSE, STEPHEN J. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Summer2011, Vol. 101 Issue 3, p885 

    The article focuses on how mental disorders affect criminal defendants during the criminal justice process in the U.S. Topics include why defendants with mental disorders require special treatment, the implications of mental disorders on the concepts of criminal responsibility and social...

  • B. Bergman, Paul // Criminal Law: Desk Reference;Dec2013, p37 

    The article discusses several terms related to criminal justice system in the U.S. including bail, best evidence rule, and booking procedures which appear in the book "Criminal Law: A Desk Reference." The term bail refers to the property or the money that an arrested suspect posts with a court...

  • Solving the prisoners dilemma. Carson, Ed // Reason;May95, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p19 

    Reports that several states are expanding community control programs for nonviolent criminals in an effort to lower costs, reduce recidivism and free up prison beds for violent criminals. Details of the programs; Florida program costs; Findings of a 1991 study on the Florida Community Control...

  • Criminal justice confronts the confidence gap. Newman, Scott C. // Indianapolis Business Journal;05/29/2000, Vol. 21 Issue 11, p12 

    Comments on the state of the criminal justice system in the United States. Paradox of progress; Establishment of public police forces and freely elected prosecution offices; Impact of computers; Decline of public confidence in criminal justice; Trend toward egalitarianism.

  • One strike and you're executed. McCrea, C.H. // Las Vegas Business Press;06/24/96, Vol. 13 Issue 39, p4 

    Opinion. Comments on the crime control act enacted by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton which, among other things, limits death row inmates to one federal appeal. Challenge by activists opposing the death penalty; Reasons why the challenge would fail; Practice which grew from the...

  • The fed's forked tongue. Siegel, Sari E. // State Government News;Mar94, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p36 

    Discusses the implications of the 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill. Opposition from the Congressional Black Caucus and other coalitions; Crime bill's legalizing its encroachment in the death penalty issue; Efforts to alleviate the congestion in prisons by building regional penitentiaries; Need for the US...

  • Bill Summary.  // Congressional Digest;Nov2000, Vol. 79 Issue 11, p263 

    Explains key provisions of the 2000 Innocence Protection Act, a package of criminal justice reforms in the United States. Exoneration of the innocent through federal post-conviction review; Measures to ensure competent legal services in capital cases; Compensation of the unjustly condemned.

  • And now for something completely different: S.1437.  // American Bar Association Journal;Jul77, Vol. 63 Issue 7, p907 

    Focuses on S.1437, the federal criminal code bill pending in the U.S. Congress as of July 1977. Historical information on attempts to make federal criminal statutes more coherent; Opponents' condemnation of the bill for its failure to expand protection of civil liberties; Gathering of all...

  • Are The Politics Of Criminal Justice Changing? Turner, Nicholas R.; Wilhelm, Daniel F. // Corrections Today;Dec2002, Vol. 64 Issue 7, p74 

    Looks at the changes in the criminal justice policy in the U.S. as of December 1, 2002. Overview of some policy initiatives in 2001 and 2002; Factors that led to the changes in criminal justice policy; Challenges faced by government leaders concerning criminal justice.

  • Paying for What They've Wrought. Edwards, Catherine // Insight on the News;07/26/99, Vol. 15 Issue 27, p46 

    Discusses the restorative justice movement which aimed to improve the criminal-justice system in the United States. Analysis on the traditional criminal justice system of the country; Information on US crime statistics; How the restorative justice movement was formed.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics