TITLE

Review: More frequent compared with less frequent chest radiographic screening may increase lung cancer mortality

PUB. DATE
March 2004
SOURCE
ACP Journal Club;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 140 Issue 2, p48
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines if screening for lung cancer reduce lung cancer mortality. Randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials that examined the effect of screening for lung cancer in adults on lung cancer mortality were performed. Study quality measures included method of randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, and description of withdrawals and dropouts. It was concluded that screening for lung cancer with chest radiography plus sputum cytologic examination does not reduce lung cancer mortality compared with chest radiography screening alone.
ACCESSION #
12597144

 

Related Articles

  • Dramatic benefits for lung cancer screening. Anekwe, Lilian // Pulse;11/2/2006, Vol. 66 Issue 41, p16 

    The article presents a major international trial which reports that screening for lung cancer using spiral computed tomography has spectacular benefits in cutting mortality from the disease. It is noted that the study of 31,567 high-risk patients achieved a 10-year survival rate of 80 percent....

  • LUNG ALERT: CT screening for lung cancer not shown to reduce mortality. Hodgson, David // Thorax;Jul2007, Vol. 62 Issue 7, p607 

    The article cites a study on the impact of CT screening on lung cancer cases and mortality. The study was conducted on asymptomatic smokers aged between 50 and 80 and their frequency of lung cancer events compared with a previously validated model. The study showed that out of 3246 patients...

  • Screening for lung cancer: yet another problem. Spiro, Stephen G. // Thorax;Feb2007, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p105 

    The author reflects on the mass screening programs implemented for lung cancer patients. He claims that chance discovery of the disease has been popular through routine chest radiography. However, he states that this method has been criticized due to the unimproved mortality rates among...

  • Review: More frequent compared with less frequent chest radiographic screening may increase lung cancer mortality: COMMENTARY. Lacasse, Yves // ACP Journal Club;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 140 Issue 2, p48 

    The article comments on a study conducted to examine the effects of screening of lung cancer in reducing lung cancer mortality. Clinicians and organizations have long ago abandoned lung cancer screening using plain chest radiography and sputum cytology. Notwithstanding the recent interest in...

  • When the Average Applies to No One: Personalized Decision Making About Potential Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening. Bach, Peter B.; Gould, Michael K. // Annals of Internal Medicine;10/16/2012, Vol. 157 Issue 8, p571 

    The authors discuss the benefits of lung cancer screening with reference to the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). They report that the risk for the lung cancer death in the high-risk patients reduced by 20 percent after three rounds of annual medical screening with low-radiation-dose...

  • Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study. Patel, Deesha; Akporobaro, Ajiri; Chinyanganya, Nyasha; Hackshaw, Allan; Seale, Clive; Spiro, Stephen G.; Griffiths, Chris // Thorax;May2012, Vol. 67 Issue 5, p418 

    Background Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer is key to reducing mortality. New evidence suggests that smokers have negative attitudes to screening and participation in lung cancer screening trials is poor (<1 in 6 of those eligible). Understanding participation is important since uptake in...

  • National Lung Screening Trial Findings by Age: Medicare-Eligible Versus Under-65 Population. Pinsky, Paul F.; Gierada, David S.; Hocking, William; Patz Jr., Edward F.; Kramer, Barnett S. // Annals of Internal Medicine;11/4/2014, Vol. 161 Issue 9, p627 

    Background: The NLST (National Lung Screening Trial) showed reduced lung cancer mortality in high-risk participants (smoking history of ≥ 30 pack-years) aged 55 to 74 years who were randomly assigned to screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus those assigned to chest...

  • Screening and early—detection of lung cancer. Vansteenkiste, J.; Dooms, C.; Mascaux, C.; Nackaerts, K. // Annals of Oncology;Sep2012 Supplement 10, Vol. 23 Issue suppl_10, px320 

    The greatest news of the past year in this field was the first large-scale early detection trial that could prove a 20% reduction in lung cancer-related mortality by screening high-risk individuals with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Several expert groups and medical societies have...

  • Screening for lung cancer: we still need to know more. Spiro, Stephen G. // Thorax;Apr2012, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p283 

    The author reflects on the research regarding the medical screening of the lung cancer with respect to the tests for the treatment of cancer. The quality-adjusted life-year is acceptable for the healthy individuals who have low risk of side effects that are resulted from the tests of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics