TITLE

Public Funds Fail to File Class Action Suits

AUTHOR(S)
Lewis, Jakema
PUB. DATE
March 2004
SOURCE
Investment Management Weekly;3/22/2004, Vol. 17 Issue 12, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the failure of public pension funds to file class action suits as means to recoup losses. Statistics on class action claims from 1992 to 2003; Probable reasons of funding institutions for not filing the claims; Discussion on various aspects of filing claims.
ACCESSION #
12588423

 

Related Articles

  • Employers Confronted With Class Action Lawsuits on 401(k) Plan Expenses. Mamorsky, Jeffrey D. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q4, p1 

    The article explores the class action lawsuits filed against Fortune 100 companies in the U.S. alleging that company officials have violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by allowing their employees to be overcharged by their 401(k) plan vendors for investment management...

  • Wisconsin turns loss into win. Johnson, Keith L.; McNeil, Ken // Pensions & Investments;5/17/2004, Vol. 32 Issue 10, p12 

    Investors are being ill-served by the legal system when it comes to addressing corporate fraud. A record $5 billion was committed last year by defendants to payment of securities class-action settlements, up from $3.1 billion in 2002, according to Securities Class Action Services. When public...

  • THE 'CLASS' WILL COME TO ORDER. Zinkewicz, Phil // Insurance Advocate;4/15/2002, Vol. 113 Issue 14, p2 

    Comments on the concept of class action lawsuits in the U.S.

  • REMOVAL OF SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 CLAIMS AFTER SLUSA: WHAT CONGRESS CHANGED, AND WHAT IT LEFT ALONE. Costa, Jordan A. // St. John's Law Review;Fall2004, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p1193 

    Discusses the removal of the Securities Act in the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of U.S. Overview of the removal jurisdiction under the Federal Securities Laws; Information on the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995; Effect of the removal of the Securities Act on the...

  • Group actions: bringing business to book. Day, Martyn // Consumer Policy Review;Sep/Oct2000, Vol. 10 Issue 5, p174 

    Discusses the concept of group legal actions in Great Britain. Historical background on group actions in Britain; Problems faced by groups in the country; Difference between the class actions in the United States and in Britain.

  • Benched. Schuck, Peter H. // Washington Monthly;Dec2000, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p35 

    Deals with impact litigation in the United States. Meaning of impact litigation; Reason for the important role of impact litigation in public life; Examples of impact litigation lawsuits; Discussion on the appeal of impact litigation.

  • Time for class action fairness to be enacted.  // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;8/2/2002, Issue 322963, p16 

    Editorial. Discusses the need for the approval of the Class Action Fairness Act in the U.S. Concerns over the negative effect of the deluge of frivolous lawsuits concerning businesses; Goal of the act to streamline the judicial system to limit abusive practices.

  • 'I'LL SEE YOU IN COURT!'. Penttila, Chris // Entrepreneur;Nov2001, Vol. 29 Issue 11, p29 

    Talks about the lawsuits filed by stockholders for their business loss. Increase in class action lawsuits filed by stockholders in year 2000; Legal process of the lawsuits; How start-up companies can deal with the lawsuits filed by stockholders.

  • Santa Strikes Back. McClurg, Andrew J. // ABA Journal;Dec2001, Vol. 87 Issue 12, p18 

    Talks about the inequality of power between defendants and plaintiffs. How defendants persuade plaintiffs to accede to their demands; Labor law violations of defendants; How defendants deceive plaintiffs.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics