TITLE

FSI, SCP Settle Patent Dispute

PUB. DATE
March 2004
SOURCE
Electronic News;3/1/2004, Vol. 50 Issue 9, pN.PAG
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the settlement of two patent infringement lawsuits between water surface tool vendors FSI International Inc. and SCP Global Technologies Inc. as of March 18, 2004. Allegations of patent infringement presented by SCP against FSI; Payment imposed on FSI for release on past claims and prospective license covering the SCP patents; Agreement of FSI to supply rinse/dry kits to SCP customers.
ACCESSION #
12553373

 

Related Articles

  • $90 million payment by Illumina to Affymetrix settles litigation.  // Medical Device Daily;1/11/2008, Vol. 12 Issue 8, p2 

    The article reports on the settlement agreement between Affymetrix and Illumina. Under the agreement, Affymetrix will receive $90 million from Illumina. The agreement states that Illumina will not admit any liability regarding the patent infringement case. On the part of Affymetrix, it will...

  • The unpredictable scope of the waiver resulting from the advice-of-council defense to willful... Goff, Jared S. // Brigham Young University Law Review;1998, Vol. 1998 Issue 1, p213 

    Analyses the waiver of attorney-client privilege and the work product protection which result from the advice-of-counsel defense to willful infringement relating to patent litigation. Definition of willful infringement; Policies supporting privileges and waiver to those privileges; Discussion on...

  • Senate Bill for Patent Reform Looks Hopeful.  // STEPS: Science, Technology, Engineering & Policy Studies;2014/2015, Issue 1, p10 

    The article discusses approval by Senate Judiciary Committee to restrict the court cases of the firms that buy old patents and sue businesses for infringing on them.

  • Solving the Patent Settlement Puzzle. Elhauge, Einer; Krueger, Alex // Texas Law Review;Dec2012, Vol. 91 Issue 2, p283 

    Courts and commentators are sharply divided about how to assess "reverse payment" patent settlements under antitrust law. The essential problem is that a PTO-issued patent provides only a probabilistic indication that courts would hold that the patent is actually valid and infringed, and parties...

  • TruePosition, Andrew bicker in patent lawsuit.  // RCR Wireless News;3/20/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p6 

    The article reports on a patent lawsuit filed by wireless location technology developer TruePosition Inc. against Andrew Corp. in October 2005. The developer alleged products of Andrew infringe on its patents for dealing with the location of cellular telephones using the wireless network control...

  • Yodlee, CashEdge Resolve Patent Fight. Wolfe, Daniel // American Banker;9/28/2007, Vol. 172 Issue 188, p9 

    The article reports that Yodlee Inc. and CashEdge Inc., two vendors of online aggregation and transfer products, have settled their three-year patent dispute. CashEdge agreed to pay Yodlee to license its patents, which cover data aggregation techniques. In 2005, Yodlee filed a lawsuit claiming...

  • An Empirical Study of Certain Settlement-Related Motions for Vacatur in Patent Cases. BOCK, JEREMY W. // Indiana Law Journal;Summer2013, Vol. 88 Issue 3, p919 

    When parties jointly move to vacate otherwise proper rulings as part of a settlement agreement, district courts often oblige. While the general practice of vacating rulings to facilitate settlement has been criticized in the academic literature as depriving the public of the benefit of judicial...

  • AngioDynamics to pay Diomed $7M in settlement of lawsuit.  // Medical Device Daily;4/4/2008, Vol. 12 Issue 66, p3 

    The article reports that a longstanding patent dispute with Diomed over varicose vein laser treatment technology has been settled by AngioDynamics. Diomed would receive a one-time payment of $7 million from AngioDynamics as part of the settlement. A Boston court ruled that Vascular Solutions and...

  • Ciphergen to pay $600,000 to settle suit with Health Discovery.  // Medical Device Daily;7/9/2007, Vol. 11 Issue 130, p4 

    The article reports that the patent infringement action against Ciphergen Biosystems has been settled by Health Discovery in July 2007. Ciphergen will pay $600,000 and receive a non-exclusive license for the use of support vector machines in applications for its SELDI-based technologies. Health...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics