TITLE

Majority and Minority Committee Reports on Reapportionment. The Minority Report

PUB. DATE
February 1929
SOURCE
Congressional Digest;Feb29, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p38
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents the Minority Committee report on Congressional reapportionment in the United States. Reasons for opposing the bill; Delegation of authority; List of losing states.
ACCESSION #
12292344

 

Related Articles

  • Reapportionment Under Estimated Population of the U. S. in 1930.  // Congressional Digest;Feb29, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p41 

    Presents a table showing how the members of the House will be reapportioned by the method of major fractions in the United States. Estimated population as of January 1930; Number of House of Representatives; Apportionment on basis of estimated population.

  • Apportionment Methods Described. Hill, Joseph A. // Congressional Digest;Feb29, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p42 

    Describes Congressional apportionment methods in the United States. Maine incident of 1900; Vinton method of 1850; Major fractions.

  • Majority and Minority Committee Reports on Reapportionment. The Majority Report.  // Congressional Digest;Feb29, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p36 

    Presents the Majority Committee report on Congressional reapportionment in the United States. Reapportionment of 1911; Effect of the proposed 1920 reapportionment; List of states expected to gain in 1930.

  • Analysis of Past Reapportionment Laws. Rhodes, Marion E. // Congressional Digest;Feb29, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p39 

    Analyzes previous Congressional reapportionment laws in the United States. First reapportionment act; Establishment of Congressional districts; Act of 1850.

  • The Reapportionment Bill, 1929.  // Congressional Digest;Feb29, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p35 

    Analyzes the provisions of the Reapportionment Bill of 1929 in the United States. Duties of the Secretary of Commerce; Method of major fractions; Election of Congress by districts equal in number to the number of Representatives to which such State may be entitled in Congress.

  • The American Rotten Borough.  // America;5/8/1926, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p77 

    The author criticizes the U.S. Congress for voting on the borough system in 1926. According to the author, the Congress has defied the Constitution when it decided on reapportionment of representation. The author claims that Congress has not acted on reapportionment despite the increases in...

  • 11 down, 20 to go. Thompson, Bill // Fort Worth Business Press;8/22/2003, Vol. 16 Issue 32, p61 

    Editorial. Talks about the U.S. senators that stay in Mexico for the purpose of preventing Republicans in the Legislature from reconfiguring the state's congressional districts. Comments on the move of the Republicans in forcing the Democrats back to Austin, Texas; Origin of most of the waste...

  • State Tectonics. Wilson, Reid // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Apr2008, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p32 

    The article discusses the impact of redisdricting on the U.S. political landscape. In 36 states, legislatures play a major role in redistricting, and will draw new boundaries at both congressional and state legislative levels after the 2012 reapportionment of House seats. Unlike in Texas, which...

  • Broken Barometer. Cohen, Richard E. // National Journal;7/12/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 28, p2240 

    Discusses the decline in the role of the U.S. House of Representatives as the grand depository of the democratic principles of the government as of July 2003. Comparison of the effectiveness of the House and the Senate in responding to the public; Assessment of the capability of Democrats to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics