TITLE

ENTERTAINMENT LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN CASES WHERE A CELEBRITY'S PUBLICITY RIGHT IS IN CONFLICT WITH A USER'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT

AUTHOR(S)
Wanat, Daniel E.
PUB. DATE
November 2003
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2003, Vol. 67 Issue 1, p251
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Analyzes the U.S. judicial decision-making in cases where an entertainer's publicity right is in conflict with a user's First Amendment right. Information on the Zacchini versus Scripps-Howard case; Approach of the U.S. Supreme Court's majority on the case; Details on the matters that are relevant to the First Amendment defense of a right of publicity claim.
ACCESSION #
12240468

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court extends protection of First Amendment to advertising. Hartman, George E. // Marketing News;7/2/76, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p12 

    The article reports on a ruling made by the U.S. Supreme Court that extends protection of First Amendment to advertising. The case involves the Virginia State Board of Pharmacy and the Virginia Citizens Council. According to the decision, an advertiser is not disqualified from protection if his...

  • WARREN COURT PRECEDENTS IN THE REHNQUIST COURT. Cross, Frank B.; Smith, Thomas A.; Tomarchio, Antonio // Constitutional Commentary;Spring2007, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p3 

    This article examines the use of particular Warren Court decisions as precedents in the Rehnquist Court. Prior research has shown that the Rehnquist Court's citation practices appeared to reduce the coherence of the U.S. Supreme Court's network of precendents. This analysis includes a sample of...

  • A giant step backwards.  // Body Politic;Aug86, Issue 129, p17 

    Focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on March 31, 1986 which uphold the state of Georgia's anti-sodomy law. Implications for domestic contracts between gay lovers; Background of a related legal case; Basis of the court's decision.

  • Without Precedent. Wittes, Benjamin // Atlantic;Sep2005, Vol. 296 Issue 2, p39 

    The article focuses on the quality of the decisions made by the U.S. Supreme Court. Many judges on the lower appeals courts have expressed their frustrations with the Court when they ignore their principles and precedents when it is convenient. Details are given from Laurence Silberman, a senior...

  • Sherman Minton: Restraint Against a Tide of Activism. Gugin, Linda C. // Vanderbilt Law Review;Mar2009, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p757 

    The article explores the tenure of Supreme Court Justice Sherman Minton in the U.S. It offers a review of the judicial ranking system in 1978, where Minton is given a failed rating. Moreover, it criticizes that the poll only represents seventy percent of the Justices and rating makers are not...

  • Federal jurisdiction and the problem of the litigative... Oakley, John B. // Texas Law Review;Jun98, Vol. 76 Issue 7, p1829 

    Addresses the relationship between four cases in which the United States Supreme Court has applied the arising-under jurisdiction rules to the confusing circumstances of actual litigation. Principles of federal-question jurisdiction; Problem of the Christianson case; Ramifications of City of...

  • WE, THE JURY. Bahls, Steven C.; Bahls, Jane Easter // Entrepreneur;Oct2000, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p114 

    Focuses on the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the case regarding employment discrimination between Roger Reeves and Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc. Background on the case; Discussion on the ruling; How to avoid employment lawsuits.

  • WHEN SPEED IS OF THE ESSENCE. Burd, Michael // People Management;3/21/2002, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p19 

    Discusses the drawbacks of the delays in the delivery of employment tribunal decisions. Effects of any delay; Comment on the target for the employment tribunal service of issuing decisions; Case wherein a delay is unavoidable.

  • The Supreme Court of the United States.  // Congressional Digest;Apr26, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p135 

    Presents a brief and non-technical review of current decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court which are of general public interest. Details of the "Alfalfa Weevil Quarantine Case"; Decision over "Baggage Tariff Liability of Intrastate Carrier".

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics