TITLE

HUGH R. JONES LECTURE AT ALBANY LAW SCHOOL

AUTHOR(S)
Levine, Howard A.
PUB. DATE
November 2003
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2003, Vol. 67 Issue 1, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the 1979 Cardozo Lecture of Judge Hugh R. Jones entitled "Cogitations on Appellate Decision-Making" at the Bar Association of the City of New York. Qualities of an ideal high court common law judge; Information on the factors in considering the art of judging; Alternative methodology to common law tradition.
ACCESSION #
12240256

 

Related Articles

  • Do Cases Make Bad Law? Schauer, Frederick // University of Chicago Law Review;Summer2006, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p883 

    The article discusses the two partial corrective practices of common law which are traditionally applied. They included the adherence to precedent rules and development of law by analogy to prior judgments. These biases both differed from the ideals of reasoned decision making and the...

  • JUSTICE BLACKSTONE'S COMMON LAW ORTHODOXY. Kadens, Emily // Northwestern University Law Review;Fall2009, Vol. 103 Issue 4, p1553 

    The article defines and describes the common law orthodoxy and its expression in William Blackstone's "Commentaries on the Laws of England." Blackstone's view of law and work is explained which shows his lack of socialization into the pragmatic ethos of common lawyers. Also discussed are the...

  • THE ROLE OF IDEOLOGY IN THE SELECTION OF APPELLATE JUDGES. Simons, Richard D. // Albany Law Review;2007, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p855 

    The article presents the text of a speech by Richard D. Simons, delivered at a symposium on state constitutions and constitutional law. He recalls his experiences working with Judge Hugh R. Jones as a junior member of the New York Court of Appeals. He claims that Jones was an excellent lawyer...

  • What A Judge Should Know. Greenhouse, Linda // Record of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York;2009, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p25 

    The article presents a lecture about what judges should know about discrimination in the U.S. The author explores discrimination related cases, rulings and judges' interpretations of relevant laws and precedents. She states that judges are bound by factual findings when it comes to the facts on...

  • COGITATIONS CONCERNING THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR PARADIGM: IS THE CURE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE? Bellacosa, Joseph W. // Albany Law Review;2008, Vol. 71 Issue 1, p1 

    The article presents a tribute to former New York Court of Appeals Judge Hugh R. Jones. His contributions to New York State's jurisprudential world, as well as his qualities as a person are discussed. His unparalleled devotion to the Institution has inspired many. In 1973, he was appointed and...

  • THE REALISM OF RACE IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF PLAINTIFFS' RACE AND JUDGES' RACE. Chew, Pat K.; Kelley, Robert E. // Harvard Journal on Racial & Ethnic Justice;Spring2012, Vol. 28, p91 

    American society is becoming increasingly diverse. At the same time, the federal judiciary continues to be predominantly White. What difference does this make? This article offers an empirical answer to that question through an extensive study of workplace racial harassment cases. It finds that...

  • A Fact-Oriented Approach In Macro-Case Analysis: A Section 385 Illustration. Wei-Chih Chiang; Englebrecht, Ted D. // Journal of Applied Business Research;Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p15 

    Prior research has not adequately addressed the coding issue in macro-case analysis research. This study provides a fact-oriented approach (in contrast to the traditional opinion-oriented approach) to deal with this issue. We argue that while a traditional opinion-oriented approach can reveal...

  • Judges, Court Deserve Respect. Eason, Marcia // Tennessee Bar Journal;Aug2007, Vol. 43 Issue 8, p3 

    The author reflects on the reasons why judges and courts deserve respect. According to the author, judges oftentimes must make difficult decisions. They are required to enforce law and legal precedent to settle and resolve problems. However, judges cannot comment publicly or defend their...

  • Common Law Decision-Making, Constitutional Shadows, and the Value of Consistency: The Jurisprudence of William F. Batchelder. FRIEDMAN, LAWRENCE // University of New Hampshire Law Review;Jan2014, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1 

    An essay is presented on the common law decision-making and the jurisprudence of the chief justice William F. Batchelder. Topics discussed include legitimacy, judicial lawmaking and claims of contract along with the property rights. It also discusses various topics including cause of action,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics