Loophole leaves employers facing huge employment claims

July 2003
Management Services;Jul2003, Vol. 47 Issue 7, p3
Academic Journal
This article discusses why turning down an employee's request for family friendly hours, in Great Britain, could cost employers tens of thousands of pounds in damages. New employment legislation gives all employees with a child under six the right to ask their employers to work fewer hours or even work from home. If an employer refuses they will have to give the employee, in writing, clear business grounds for their decision. An employee who disagrees with their employer's decision can then bring a claim for damages in an employment tribunal. What is more, although the flexible working rules were designed to prevent an employee from challenging an employer's decision, if a sex discrimination claim is brought at the same time, the employer will automatically lose this protection. This means that the burden will be on employers to justify their reasons to a tribunal and face hefty damages if the tribunal disagrees with their decision.


Related Articles

  • Ä°Ä° HUKUKUNDA ÇALIÄ°MA SÃœRELERÄ°NÄ°N DÃœZENLENMESÄ° VE FAZLA ÇALIÄ°MA İÇİN İİÇİNÄ°N ONAYI. Güngör, Esin Gürbüz // Ege Academic Review;2009, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p1545 

    According to the Labour Law, it is necessary the approval of the employee for the flexible working time and for the overtime working. This paper analyses conditions and restrictions of the approval of the employee towards the Turkish law and European law in the frame of the employee's protection...

  • NOTE PAD.  // People Management;2/10/2011, p12 

    This section offers news briefs concerning personnel management including 13.5 weekly alcohol consumption of British managers, removing time for non-work conversations of Carlisle City Council workers, and Thai airline PC Air legalizing employment of transsexual air hostesses.

  • CBI attacks EU on 48-hour week.  // Accountancy;Mar2004, Vol. 133 Issue 1327, p121 

    The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has attacked the European parliament after Members of the European Parliament voted to end the choice of employees to work more than 48 hours a week. CBI representatives have been fighting to keep the British right to opt out of the European Union...

  • Controversial Maryland Flexible Leave Act Becomes Law. Lewis, Jackson // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the Maryland Flexible Leave Act which takes effect October 1, 2008, requiring Maryland businesses employing 15 or more employees to allow their employees to use any form of accrued leave with pay to care for an immediate family member who is sick. It is noted that the law...

  • Case round-up.  // Personnel Today;10/28/2003, p14 

    No abstract available.

  • Staff want to 'keep long hours' Roberts, Zoe // People Management;5/29/2003, Vol. 9 Issue 11, p7 

    Deals with the preference of employers and employees in Great Britain to retain opt-out provision for overtime work under the Working Time Regulations as of May 2003. Assessment of the impact of the removal of opt-out provisions on the working culture of the country; Ways in which employers may...

  • Wages...Hours.  // Labor Law Journal;Dec57, Vol. 8 Issue 12, p898 

    The article presents information on various developments related to labor relations. Where a new toll road under construction was an extension of the existing system of interstate highways the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was held to cover such construction. This decision, reached by a...

  • Scheduling Staggered Workweeks Sustained.  // Labor Law Journal;Nov66, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p700 

    This article focuses on the ruling of arbitrator Vernon H. Jensen, on a case involving unilaterally scheduled, staggered workweeks. Jensen ruled that unilaterally scheduled, staggered workweeks did not violate a company's contract. The contract contained language explicitly referring to...

  • Restructuring Work week and Shifts a Management Right. Teple, Edwin R. // Labor Law Journal;Aug69, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p456 

    This article presents a summary of the judgment made by a U.S. government agency on the labor case U.S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc. and Papermakers, Local 1967. Pleased with a new premium pay provision that provided double time pay for employees who regularly worked Sundays on a seven-day,...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics