TITLE

IN JEOPARDY

PUB. DATE
November 1993
SOURCE
New Republic;11/15/93, Vol. 209 Issue 20, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the implications of the U.S. attorney general's review of the Reginald Denny verdict. Factual background on the case; Federal prosecution in the face of state acquittals in politically sensitive cases; Impact of the review on the stability of the judiciary system in the country; Decision whether the federal government should file civil rights charges against the black men acquitted of beating a white truck driver; Possible stretching of the meaning of civil rights law.
ACCESSION #
12082305

 

Related Articles

  • IN JEOPARDY.  // New Republic;11/15/93, Vol. 209 Issue 20, p9 

    Focuses on the implications of the U.S. attorney general's review of the Reginald Denny verdict. Factual background on the case; Federal prosecution in the face of state acquittals in politically sensitive cases; Impact of the review on the stability of the judiciary system in the country;...

  • Civil Jury Trial Mistakes. PAINE, DONALD F. // Tennessee Bar Journal;Dec2012, Vol. 48 Issue 12, p21 

    The article focuses on common mistakes that are made prior to civil jury trials. Topics include the demand for a jury trial by a plaintiff, the filing of pleadings prior to stated deadlines, and the procedural mistakes that will revoke an individual's guaranteed jury trial. Information is...

  • Federal Criminal Litigation Notes.  // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Nov2006, p216 

    The article reports that the Massachusetts District judge has rejected a petition for habeas corpus concerning the Leftwich v. Maloney case. The Court judge has found that the trial court's exclusion of evidence about the homosexual proclivities and lifestyle of the victim was not a reason for...

  • TITLE: SECTION 24(2): DOES THE TRUTH COST TOO MUCH? Pearn, Matthew // University of New Brunswick Law Journal;Mar2011, Vol. 62, p147 

    The article focuses on the exclusion of probative evidence from a criminal trial within the Supreme Court of Canada when a state actor has violated a constitutional right of the defendant as ensured by the Charter. It says that the majority decision from R V Grant has widened the discretion of...

  • EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Edwards, Warden v. Carpenter, case number 98-2060, argued on February 28, 2000 and decided on April 25, 2000. This case focuses on the issue of whether a federal habeas court is prevented from considering an...

  • EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Edwards, Warden v. Carpenter, case number 98-2060, argued on February 28, 2000 and decided on April 25, 2000. This case focuses on the issue of whether a federal habeas court is prevented from considering an...

  • SECTION 1983 LITIGATION: POST-PEARSON AND POST-IQBAL. Blum, Karen M. // Touro Law Review;Dec2010, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p433 

    The article discusses the framework of the analysis to be conducted in adjudicating qualified immunity defense in Section 1983 litigation based on several court cases in the U.S. It highlights the Supreme Court case Pearson v. Callahan where the court overruled the mandatory nature of two-step...

  • Do agents owe clients fiduciary duty? Zalma, Barry // American Agent & Broker;Aug2010, Vol. 82 Issue 8, p10 

    The article discusses a court case in New York wherein the plaintiff established a fiduciary relationship that exists between the seller and the buyer of a life settlement contract. The Supreme Court, which is a court of the attorney general, examined the regulation that implements sanctions to...

  • SECOND CIRCUIT CLARIFIES THE PROPER ROLE OF A DISTRICT COURT IN CONSIDERING A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CHALLENGING AN EXTRADITION ORDER.  // International Law Update;Oct-Dec2011, Vol. 17, p80 

    The article focuses on the move of the U.S. Second Circuit Court to clarify the proper role of a district court to consider a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging an extradition order. It cites the case Dimitrios Skaftouros vs. the U.S. The Court declares that in order to merit...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics