TITLE

HARMELIN'S FAULTY ORIGINALISM

AUTHOR(S)
Zydney Mannheimer, Michael J.
PUB. DATE
March 2014
SOURCE
Nevada Law Journal;Spring2014, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p522
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Harmelin v. Michigan which deals with the enforcement of life sentence without the possible action of parole for possessing cocaine. Topics discussed include the argument of former Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Antonin Scalia on the case, the claims of the petitioner on the violation of Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause in the ruling, and the application of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to the decision.
ACCESSION #
120540065

 

Related Articles

  • Does Sentencing a 13-Year-Old Offender to Life Without Parole Constitute "Cruel and Unusual Punishment"? Pro.  // Supreme Court Debates;Jan2010, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p25 

    The article examines the views of Amici Curiae, consisting of groups like Amnesty International and a law professor, on why it is cruel and unusual to sentence a 13-year-old offender to life without parole. U.S. law has reportedly referred to international standards with respect to cruel and...

  • Does Sentencing a 13-Year-Old Offender to Life Without Parole Constitute "Cruel and Unusual Punishment"? Con.  // Supreme Court Debates;Jan2010, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p36 

    The article examines the views of Amici Curiae, consisting of U.S. states and an assistant Attorney General, on why it is not cruel and unusual to sentence a 13-year-old offender to life without parole. The imposition of such a sentence is reportedly rare, but not unconstitutional and is...

  • OPINION OF THE COURT IN MILLER V. ALABAMA.  // Supreme Court Debates;Oct2012, Vol. 15 Issue 7, p31 

    The article comments on life imprisonment without parole with reference to the case Miller v. Alabama. It mentions thatthe Eighth Amendment is violated by imposing death penalty for nonhomicide crimes against individuals. It concludes that life imprisonment without parole against childen...

  • ACCOUNTING FOR PUNISHMENT IN PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW. TORTI, JULIA L. // New York University Law Review;Nov2013, Vol. 88 Issue 5, p1908 

    The Eighth Amendment has been interpreted to demand proportionality between an offender's crime and his punishment. However, the current proportionality standard is widely regarded as meaningless. In weighing the severity of the crime against the harshness of the punishment, modern courts do not...

  • The Aftermath of Miller v. Alabama.  // Juvenile Justice Update;Apr/May2013, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p5 

    The article focuses on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Miller v. Alabama court case on other lawsuits in five states of the country. The ruling focused on the violation of prohibition on punishments under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution due to mandatory life...

  • Miller v. Alabama: Implications for Forensic Mental Health Assessment at the Intersection of Social Science and the Law. Larson, Kimberly; DiCataldo, Frank; Kinscherff, Robert // New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement;Spring2013, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p319 

    The article describes the U.S. Constitution Eighth Amendment protection of juveniles that prohibits juveniles from being sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. It highlights the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. Alabama that sentences of life without the possibility of...

  • Proportionality and the Eighth Amendment: Harmelin v. Michigan, 111 S. Ct. 2680 (1991). Campbell, Bruce // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter92, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p284 

    Discusses the Supreme Court's decision in the case `Harmelin v. Michigan.' Comparison with `Solem v. Helm'; Opinions about the meaning of proportionality in the Eighth Amendment; Speculations about the original intentions of the framers of the Eighth Amendment.

  • OUR BROKEN DEATH PENALTY. FLETCHER, WILLIAM A. // New York University Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p805 

    The article presents a speech entitled "Our Broken Death Penalty" by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judge William A. Fletcher which was delivered as the James Madison Lecture at the New York University School of Law on October 15, 2013. According to the article, the U.S. Supreme...

  • A Conversation with Justice Stevens. Stevens, John Paul; Greenhouse, Linda // Yale Law & Policy Review;Spring2012, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p303 

    An interview with former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is presented. Stevens discusses various topics, including his book "Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir," and the 1991 case Harmelin v. Michigan which deals with a life sentence for a first-time drug offender. Stevens also...

  • Not Just Kid Stuff? Extending Graham and Miller to Adults. O'Hear, Michael M. // Missouri Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 78 Issue 3, p1087 

    The article focuses on extension of the Eighth Amendment protections that prohibits life imprisonment without parole (LWOP) to adult defendants with reference to the U.S Supreme Court's ruling in case Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama that prohibited sentences of LWOP for juveniles. Other...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics