Why French Postponement?

April 2000
Logistics & Transport Focus;Apr2000, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p8
Trade Publication
Reports that the British International Freight Association is pressing the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions to clarify the position as the French government has decided not to introduce the Dangerous Goods Safety Adviser legislation until 2001, leaving the rest of the European Union in a difficult position.


Related Articles

  • Recent Events in Government Policy.  // Logistics & Transport Focus;Mar2001, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p45 

    Reports on government policy-related developments in the field of business logistics in Great Britain, as of March 2001.

  • Consignee Denies Delivery. Barrett, Colin // Traffic World;4/10/2000, Vol. 262 Issue 2, p54 

    Responds to a question submitted by a reader of the periodical 'Traffic World,' regarding a situation wherein a consignee insists that he has never received a specific shipment and refused to pay for the goods until a replacement shipment was delivered. Situation wherein a carrier would be held...

  • Global Logistics/Transportation. Bolte, Jr., Richard J. // Business Credit;Nov/Dec2000, Vol. 102 Issue 10, p74 

    Discusses global logistics and transportation as an evolving frontier of strategic value and total savings. Impact of the 1999 Ocean Shipping Reform Act (OSRA); Lessons from the recent history of deregulation in transportation sectors; Factors to consider when choosing a global logistics...

  • CSI is Coming on Fast. Trunick, Perry A. // Transportation & Distribution;Jan2003, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p58 

    Focuses on the impact of the Container Security Initiative (CSI) on logistics and supply chain companies in the U.S. Goals of the CSI; Importance of the CSI on creating a virtual border at the port of origin; Requirements for CSI compliance.

  • Logistics Provider Liability. Calderwood, James A. // Transportation & Distribution;Jun2002, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p11 

    Discusses the legal liability of a logistics company in a shipment contract. U.S. federal court ruling on the issue; Basis of the court for the non-liability of the logistics company; Solution to the problem.

  • Going Up. Boyce, Clayton // Traffic World;11/29/99, Vol. 260 Issue 9, p5 

    Editorial. Focuses on the effect of government regulation on the expenses of shippers and logistics and transportation companies in the United States. Implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration rules; Advantages of the rules on employees; Actions taken by the shippers...

  • How safe is logistics in China? Tong, Afred // Asian Chemical News;3/17/2003, Vol. 9 Issue 393, p8 

    Comments on the safety standards of the logistics industry in China. Criticism on risks associated with logistics in China; Views on the quality of driving and training of drivers; Information on legislation governing transporting dangerous chemicals.

  • Just in Time to Wait. Schulz, John D. // Traffic World;3/27/2000, Vol. 261 Issue 13, p22 

    Focuses on the impact of hours-of-service (HOS) regulations proposals on productivity of shippers and carriers in the United States. Causes of billion losses in productivity; Overview of the HOS proposals; Information on the existing US Department of Trade regulations on HOS; Advantages and...

  • Liability for Concealed Damage. Barrett, Colin // Traffic World;3/27/2000, Vol. 261 Issue 13, p46 

    Presents a question and answer advisory regarding the lost bill of lading and the liability for concealed damage in business logistics. Discussion regarding the liability of trucking company for concealed damage of products; Analysis of bill of lading; Importance of bills of lading copies in...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics