TITLE

Re-assessing the Evidentiary Regime of the International Court of Justice: A Case for Codifying Its Discretion to Exclude Evidence

AUTHOR(S)
Siyuan Chen
PUB. DATE
January 2015
SOURCE
International Commentary on Evidence;Jan2015, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
119339382

 

Related Articles

  • UPOTREBA GEOGRAFSKIH KARATA KAO DOKAZA U PRAKSI MEĐUNARODNOG SUDA PRAVDE. NOVAKOVIĆ, Marko // Medunarodni Problemi;2016, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p95 

    The paper deals with the use of geographic maps as evidence in the practice of the International Court of Justice with a view to the latest cases in which the Court in its judgments elaborated maps as evidence: the case Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica...

  • The International Court of Justice's Treatment of Circumstantial Evidence and Adverse Inferences. Schar, Michael P.; Day, Margaux // Chicago Journal of International Law;Summer2012, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p123 

    This Article examines a vexing evidentiary question with which the International Court of Justice has struggled in several cases, namely: What should the Court do when one of the parties has exclusive access to critical evidence and refuses to produce it for security or other reasons? In its...

  • The Evidentiary Procedure before the International Court of Justice: the Case Study of Three Judgments. Đajić, Sanja // Proceedings of Novi Sad Faculty of Law / Zbornik Radova Pravnog ;2011, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p215 

    Though evidentiary procedure before the International Court of Justice has been regulated by the Statute and Rules of the Court, most of evidentiary issues and rules have been clarified and established in the case law. That is why the focus of this article is on those cases where factual...

  • Digital Evidence as a Means of Proof before the International Court of Justice. Roscini, Marco // Journal of Conflict & Security Law;Winter2016, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p541 

    This article discusses the use of digital evidence as a means of proof before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The absence of specific Court rules and procedures for digital evidence (with the exception of Practice Direction IXbis) is not necessarily an obstacle to its production and...

  • Warping the Rules: How Some Courts Misapply Generic Evidentiary Rules to Exclude Polygraph Evidence. Bush, John C. // Vanderbilt Law Review;Mar2006, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p539 

    The article presents information on how courts misinterpret generic evidentiary rules to exclude polygraph evidence in the United States. In 1923, the Washington D.C. Circuit Court's decision to exclude polygraph evidence case was the first in a series of decisions to exclude polygraph evidence....

  • IDENTIFYING COMMON EVIDENTIARY ISSUES -- IN -- TRUCKING LITIGATION. Spratlin Jr., Arthur D. // Brief;Fall2011, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p32 

    The article discusses the spoliation issues in identifying the common evidentiary issues in trucking litigation. It states spoliation refers to the destruction or failure to preserve evidence necessary to pending litigation. It states the trial court may dismiss the case or exclude testimony...

  • Evidence. Hall, John E.; Scott Henwood, W. // Mercer Law Review;Fall2011, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p153 

    The article presents a survey of Georgia cases and legislation involving evidence law. The Georgia General Assembly decided to model its evidentiary code after the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence. Georgia's version of the Best Evidence rule, which is codified in § 24-5-4 of the Official Code...

  • Evidentiary Issues in International Disputes Related to State Responsibility for Cyber Operations. ROSCINI, MARCO // Texas International Law Journal;2015, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p233 

    The article reports some evidentiary issues, such as unlawful conduct, are not peculiar to cyber operations, in inter-state litigation. Topics discussed include the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case 'Nicaragua v. United States;' the Russian Federation's 2007...

  • Right of Opponent to IRS Summons to Obtain an Evidentiary hearing Premised Upon Allegations of Improper Purpose. Halloran, Michele LaForest // Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases;4/21/2014, Vol. 41 Issue 7, p282 

    The article discusses United States v. Clarke et al., whether respondents in a proceeding brought by government to enforce Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summonses are entitled to evidentiary hearing where they allege summons issuance for improper motive but with limited support for allegations....

  • Offering Objectionable Evidence -- Does an Adversary's Failure to Object Make the Practice Right? Pivnick, Lawrence A. // Tennessee Bar Journal;Dec2010, Vol. 46 Issue 12, p18 

    The article discusses the rule on evidence regarding the intentional evidentiary violations especially on offering an inadmissible evidence during trial among lawyers in the U.S. It mentions that some lawyers intentionally offers an inadmissible evidence to advance their intention. It states...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics