TITLE

Neither biasing, nor simple: Epistemically rational heuristics for strategic decision making

AUTHOR(S)
Cholakova, Magdalena; Grandori, Anna
PUB. DATE
January 2016
SOURCE
Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings;2016, Vol. 2016 Issue 1, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Conference Proceeding
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The classic repertory of tools for decision making in management is inspired by a fundamental and widespread assumption: as uncertainty increases and decisions become more difficult, the rationality of decision strategies decreases. Actors use heuristics that are said to avoid uncertainty, to save cognitive effort and to reduce the costs of search. Those heuristics are characterized as simple and frugal, as they shortcut complex analysis of problems by looking for and stopping at approximate and satisfying solutions. It is on this basis that they are characterized as efficient and effective. This paper and study is motivated by the observation that in decisions that are both uncertain and important, a different approach to uncertainty is possible and arguably better: to master rather than reduce it and to strengthen thought rather than to minimize cognitive effort. The study presented considers complex problems, which are unique and have to be defined, and shows that effective heuristics in those setting are themselves more complex. In addition, when problems are important, decision strategies should be evaluated not by being fast or having worked in the past but by more ambitious criteria as the validity of knowledge and the quality of judgments (epistemic rationality). Using a simulation of early-stage project evaluations by expert angel investors and a novel process tracing technique, we show that such complex heuristics are indeed applied and improve judgment. Furthermore, relying on set-theoretical methods, we provide initial evidence on the joint use of those heuristics, proposing a configurational analysis of decision strategies.
ACCESSION #
119238568

 

Related Articles

  • Impact of Resource Based View and Resource Dependence Theory on Strategic Decision Making. Nemati, Ali Raza; Bhatti, Afkar Majeed; Maqsal, Muhammad; Mansoor, Immad; Naveed, Fariha // International Journal of Business & Management;Dec2010, Vol. 5 Issue 12, p110 

    This paper aims to investigate different factors determining strategic Decision making. This study attempts to identify the role of RBV and RDT and its impact on strategic Decision making. It has been seen that different strategies has to be made to get competitive advantage keeping in mind...

  • Closure, Defeasibility and Conclusive Reasons. Almeida, Claudio // Acta Analytica;Winter2007, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p301 

    It is argued, on the basis of new counterexamples, that neither knowledge nor epistemic justification (or “epistemic rationality”) can reasonably be thought to be closed under logical implication. The argument includes an attempt to reconcile the fundamental intuitions of the...

  • The role of experience on techno-entrepreneurs' decision making biases. Nouri, Pouria; Jamali, Behrooz; Ghasemi, Ehsan // Management Science Letters;2012, Vol. 2 Issue 6, p1957 

    Entrepreneurs are the driving force behind the prospect and growth of the societies. Sound and wise decisions pave the way for them to carry out these highly important functions. Entrepreneurs are to discover and exploit opportunities. Therefore, they must gather sufficient and pertinent...

  • Decision-Making under Uncertainty: Using Case Studies for Teaching Strategy in Complex Environments. Franke, Dr. Volker // Journal of Military & Strategic Studies;Winter2011, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p1 

    The article examines the effectiveness of case study method for teaching strategy and strategic decision-making to military professional. It analyzes some of the cognitive frames that inform strategic decision making. It discusses the significance of heuristic shortcuts as cognitive...

  • Heuristic Judgment Theory. Harvey, John T. // Journal of Economic Issues (Association for Evolutionary Economi;Mar98, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p47 

    Orthodox economic thought is based on the idea that all economic activity is due to deliberate choice. Expected utility theory purports to explain these processes. The approach is simple and easily represented mathematically. It is well accepted by neoclassical economists and plays a...

  • Democracy and scientific expertise: illusions of political and epistemic inclusion. Trout, J. // Synthese;Apr2013, Vol. 190 Issue 7, p1267 

    Realizing the ideal of democracy requires political inclusion for citizens. A legitimate democracy must give citizens the opportunity to express their attitudes about the relative attractions of different policies, and access to political mechanisms through which they can be counted and heard....

  • Heuristic Effects on Decision-Making, Can Heuristic be Simpler Ways to Resolve Decision-Making Problems? Misbah, S.; Khan, Saif- Ur-Rehman; Khalifah, Zainab Binti // Journal of Next Generation Information Technology;Sep2013, Vol. 4 Issue 7, p16 

    This study examines the commonly observed relationship between various simple and fast heuristics and decision-making. A major concern in management has been to understand and improve fast and quick decision-making. This study will also give a brief description of heuristics and discuss some of...

  • Rational choice in field archaeology. Pavel, Cătălin // Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology & Sociology;Fall2011, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p117 

    In the present article I attempt to apply advances in the study of instrumental and epistemic rationality to field archaeology in order to gain insights into the ways archaeologists reason. The cognitive processes, particularly processes of decision making, that enable archaeologists to conduct...

  • Angry Decisions.  // Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association;Fall2007, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p9 

    The article presents an overview of a study on the decision making ability of angry individuals, which was published in the May 2007 issue of "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin." The study concluded that angry individuals can and do process analytically. The findings refute previous...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics