TITLE

SEOS: A FOURTH NON-ARISTOTELIAN MODEL

AUTHOR(S)
Bourland Jr., D. David
PUB. DATE
September 1998
SOURCE
ETC: A Review of General Semantics;Fall98, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p250
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
1190676

 

Related Articles

  • SLABOUMNOST MISELNIH SISTEMOV. Tomšič, Samo // Filozofski Vestnik;2007, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p145 

    The paper discusses the critique of the Aristotelian foundation of the logico-philosophical discourse on the nature of language developed by Lacan in his later teaching. The critique follows the idea that for philosophy, giving meaning to the real is the only possible way of thinking thereal. By...

  • La argumentación retórica como base interpretativa de la inducción aristotélica. Andrés Mercado, Juan // Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía;1997, Issue 12, p43 

    The passages in Aristotle's Rhetoric where induction (έπαγωγή) is discussed show it as a very useful kind of argumentation, somehow related to example (παραλείγμα). This latter is based on the perception of some kind of similarities among the...

  • GENERAL SEMANTICS AND AUTHORITARIANISM. Brooks, Allan // ETC: A Review of General Semantics;Oct2004, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p349 

    Focuses on general semantics and authoritarianism. Information on the syllogism of Aristotle; Description of general semantics; Definition of open-mindedness; Effects of authoritarianism on adolescents.

  • Practical Knowledge: Knowing How To and Knowing That. Wiggins, David // Mind;Jan2012, Vol. 121 Issue 481, p97 

    Ryle's account of practical knowing is much controverted. The paper seeks to place present disputations in a larger context and draw attention to the connection between Ryle's preoccupations and Aristotle's account of practical reason, practical intelligence, and the way in which human beings...

  • Three Concerns about the Origins of Content. Jacobson, Anne // Philosophia;Sep2015, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p625 

    In this paper I will present three reservations about the claims made by Hutto and Satnet. First of all, though TNOC is presented as drawing on teleological theories of mental content for a conception of Ur-Intentionaltiy, what is separated out after objectionable claims are removed from...

  • AMBIGUITY. RAMOS, V. // Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry & Poetics 4th Edition;6/2/2012, p43 

    A definition of the term "ambiguity" is presented. It refers to the simultaneous availability of several interpretations or meanings. It cites the various identification of the term as a property of verbal structure of literary genres and forms including semantic, lexical and syntactic. The...

  • Back to Bekker. Syntactic Remarks on Aristotle, Sophistical Refutations 170 B19–26. Ferroni, Lorenzo; Gili, Luca // Methexis;Mar2018, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p60 

    This paper offers a syntactic analysis of Aristotle, Sophistical Refutations , 170 b19–26. Several conjectures have been proposed to simplify the passage. We show that no conjectural activity is needed and that the text transmitted by the manuscripts and printed by I. Bekker (1831) fits...

  • Implicaciones semánticas y metafísicas de la atingencia del Principio de no contradicción en Metafísica Γ4. MIÉ, FABIÁN // Anuario Filosofico;2013, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p143 

    According to M. Wedin, R. M. Dancy and C. Kirwan, Aristotle does not restrict the range of the Principle of Non-Contradiction to essential sentences about substances. The reason for this is that the Principle lies on the universal character of perse-being and on each thing's essence. Contrary to...

  • THE HARLOT MEETS THE GENERAL. PETERSON, VALERIE // ETC: A Review of General Semantics;Jul2008, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p252 

    An essay is presented on general semantics (GS). It explores the similarities between studying GS and studying rhetorical theory and presents information about the history of studying rhetorical theory. The writing of Aristotle on rhetoric, in "Rhetoric" and "Organon," is examined and the...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics