TITLE

Firm owners get double benefit from tax bracket leveraging

AUTHOR(S)
Sullivan, J. Craig
PUB. DATE
October 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;10/5/98, Vol. 102 Issue 40, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Explains how closely held firm owners in the United States get double benefit from tax bracket leveraging. Relationship between personal income tax bracket and corporate income tax bracket; How increasing amounts of corporate pretax profits are taxed; Explanation of the dual benefit plan, which requires use of a cash value life insurance policy.
ACCESSION #
1185769

 

Related Articles

  • The new replacement for post-retirement group life. BARDES, DAVID A. // Employee Benefit News;Dec2009, Vol. 23 Issue 15, p15 

    The article focuses on the advantages of group retirement insurance plans (GRIP) over group insurance life policy (GULP) for U.S. employers. It says that GULP does not incur income taxes but it does not replace the loss of post-retirement life insurance benefits. In contrast, GRIPs are noted to...

  • The Qualified Appraisal Rules. Tidd, Jonathan G. // Trusts & Estates;Oct2013, Vol. 152 Issue 10, p14 

    The article discusses qualified appraisal (QA) rules which are found in Section 170(f)(13) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code as of October 2013, focusing on efforts to eliminate reported valuation abuses and tax shelter schemes involving charitable gifts. Life insurance policies, noncompliance,...

  • IRS Allows Loss on Surrender of a Life Insurance Contract. Commito, Thomas F. // Journal of Financial Service Professionals;Mar2010, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p14 

    Private Letter Ruling 200945032 allows a loss deduction for a life insurance policy. Unfortunately, the IRS continues to assert that in certain situations, basis in a life policy must be reduced by COI charges. This is already an element of contention, and it will remain to be seen how this...

  • PLR 201332001.  // Trusts & Estates;Jan2014 Tex Year Review Supplement, p11 

    The article discusses the U.S. Internal Revenue Service's release of Private Letter Ruling (PLR) 201332001 on May 10, 2013 which states that the purchase of a joint and survivor insurance policy by a grantor trust is covered by an exception to a transfer-for-value rule contained in Section...

  • Income-tax progressivity: A century-old debate. Rosen, Harvey S. // Business Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia);Jan/Feb90, p3 

    Presents information on the controversy arising about income-tax progressivity. Explanation on what is progressivity; A hypothetical income-tax structure to distinguish the average tax rate and the marginal tax rate; Edgeworth's model of optimal tax progressivity; Critique of Edgeworth's model.

  • Your money. Blue, Ronald // Marriage Partnership;Winter93, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p72 

    Provides advice to a couple who cannot afford to pay the tax they owe. Ways to decrease the taxes; Setting up of payment schedule by the Internal Revenue Service.

  • The relationship between federal and state individual income tax progressivity. Scott, Charles E.; Triest, Robert K. // National Tax Journal;Jun93, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p95 

    Examines the extent to which states modified the progressivity of their individual income tax systems following federal tax changes in the 1980s. Relationship between the federal and state personal income tax systems; Need for jointly analyzing the state and federal tax systems when analyzing...

  • Re: Joyce! Brown, Kenneth C. // Outlook;Winter90, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p70 

    Focuses on the case of `Joyce vs Finnigan' which has implications on taxation in the United States. US State Board of Equalization's (SBE) lack of certainty on its position on the case; Consequences of the SBE decision on corporate income taxes; Details and background on the case.

  • Contingent liabilities not counted for insolvency.  // Practical Accountant;Feb98, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p18 

    Comments that partners in partnerships excluded income claiming insolvency, as it pertains to income taxation in the United States. Challenges made by the Internal Revenue Service to two contingent liabilities used to determine insolvency.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics