Early versus Delayed Fixation of Pelvic Ring Fractures

Connor, Geoffrey S.; McGwin Jr., Gerald; MacLennan, Paul A.; Alonso, Jorge E.; Rue III, Loring W.
December 2003
American Surgeon;Dec2003, Vol. 69 Issue 12, p1019
Academic Journal
This retrospective study reports, outcomes, after early and delayed surgical stabilization of fractures of the pelvic ring, in terms of pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization. The hospital course of 151 patients admitted to an academic teaching hospital who sustained acute fractures of the pelvic ring between June 1996 and December 2000 was reviewed. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), timing of operative fixation, and the incidence of pulmonary complications were analyzed. Radiographs were reviewed and fractures classified according to the modified Tile system. Tile fracture types B and C patients who underwent fixation within 1 week of injury (n = 71) were compared to those in whom surgery was delayed (n = 28). Adjusting for the ISS, early-repair patients had a lower risk of pulmonary complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25-0.96), a reduced length of hospital stay (12.2 vs. 20.5 days; P = 0.0005), and overall reduced cost of care ($57,084 vs. $158,625; P = 0.0317). Pelvic ring fixation within the first week of injury results in significantly reduced incidence of pulmonary complication, hospital stay, and cost of care regardless of injury severity. The coordinated team approach to insure prompt resuscitation, stabilization, and operative fixation results in more optimal patient outcomes.


Related Articles

  • Effects of physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medicine service: results of a trial of hospitalists. Meltzer, David; Manning, Willard G.; Morrison, Jeanette; Shah, Manish N.; Lei Jin; Guth, Todd; Levinson, Wendy; Jin, Lei // Annals of Internal Medicine;12/3/2002, Vol. 137 Issue 11, p866 

    Background: Hospitalists may decrease costs and improve outcomes in hospitalized patients, but existing evidence is limited and has not identified mechanisms for such effects.Objective: To study the costs and outcomes for patients on an academic general medicine service...

  • Incisional Hernia Rate May Increase After Single-Port Cholecystectomy. Alptekin, Husnu; Yilmaz, Huseyin; Acar, Fahrettin; Kafali, M. Ertugrul; Sahin, Mustafa // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Oct2012, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p731 

    Background: The major concerns of single-port cholecystectomy are port-site hernia and cost. Essentially, a larger transumbilical incision is more likely to increase the incidence of incisional hernia. The effect of single-port cholecystectomy on hospital cost is controversial. This study...

  • Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Low, Donald; Low, Donald E // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;Aug2011, Vol. 15 Issue 8, p1319 

    Introduction: Complications following esophagectomy significantly affect outcomes, including perioperative mortality, costs, and survival. Anastomotic leak remains one of the most serious complications, and early recognition and appropriate initial treatment are...

  • Minimally Invasive Liver Resection: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy. Packiam, Vignesh; Bartlett, David; Tohme, Samer; Reddy, Srinevas; Marsh, J.; Geller, David; Tsung, Allan // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;Dec2012, Vol. 16 Issue 12, p2233 

    Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). Methods: A retrospective analysis was made comparing robotic ( n = 11) and laparoscopic ( n = 18) LLS performed at the University of Pittsburgh...

  • Improving patient safety through the systematic evaluation of patient outcomes. Forster, Alan J.; Dervin, Geoff; Martin Jr., Claude; Papp, Steven // Canadian Journal of Surgery;Dec2012, Vol. 55 Issue 6, p418 

    Despite increased advocacy for patient safety and several large-scale programs designed to reduce preventable harm, most notably surgical checklists, recent data evaluating entire health systems suggests that we are no further ahead in improving patient safety and that hospital complications are...

  • OUTCOME AND COST COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR VERSUS OPEN LICHTENSTEIN TECHNIQUE. Khan, Nadim; Babar, Tariq Sohail; Ahmad, Munir; Ahmad, Zahoor; Shah, Liaqat Ali // JPMI: Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute;2013, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p310 

    Objectives: To compare the outcome and cost of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair versus open repair. Methodology: This was a randomized controlled study conducted on 100 patients from January 2011 till April 2012, in Surgical 'A' unit, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. A total of 100 patients...

  • Outcomes and Cost of Diverted Versus Undiverted Restorative Proctocolectomy. Stey, Anne; Brook, Robert; Keeler, Emmett; Harris, Michael; Heimann, Tomas; Steinhagen, Randolph // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;May2014, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p995 

    Background: Some observational studies suggest that diversion during restorative proctocolectomy mitigates the risk of anastomotic complications. However, diversion has its own costs and complications. The aim of this study was to compare the cost and outcomes of diverted to undiverted...

  • Improving Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Surgery. Steele, Scott; Bleier, Joshua; Champagne, Brad; Hassan, Imran; Russ, Andrew; Senagore, Anthony; Sylla, Patricia; Pigazzi, Alessio // Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;Nov2014, Vol. 18 Issue 11, p1944 

    No abstract available.

  • Association of Hospital Participation in a Quality Reporting Program With Surgical Outcomes and Expenditures for Medicare Beneficiaries. Osborne, Nicholas H.; Nicholas, Lauren H.; Ryan, Andrew M.; Thumma, Jyothi R.; Dimick, Justin B. // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;2/3/2015, Vol. 313 Issue 5, p496 

    IMPORTANCE: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) provides feedback to hospitals on risk-adjusted outcomes. It is not known if participation in the program improves outcomes and reduces costs relative to nonparticipating hospitals. OBJECTIVE:...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics