Do Not Disguise Discrimination Within a Reduction in Force

Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E.
October 1998
Workforce;Oct98, Vol. 77 Issue 10, p123
Focuses on some court cases regarding discrimination dangers during reduction in force (RIF) in the United States. Claims of employees against the Seagate Technology Inc.; Claims of the dismissed employees against Norden Systems company; Court's decisions regarding the cases.


Related Articles

  • Promoting FOI in your own backyard. Hale, F. Dennis // Editor & Publisher;7/15/95, Vol. 128 Issue 28, p48 

    Focuses on the promotion of freedom of information (FoI) in the United States. State campaign for FoI; Maturity of FoI policy; Court decisions on FoI; Suggested strategies.

  • Discharge of pregnant employee. Lissy, William E. // Supervision;Apr91, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p21 

    Presents a case on pregnancy discrimination. Court's decision on the case.

  • Fiber-optic lighting has all the effects. Knisley, Joseph R. // CEE News;Apr2000, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p34 

    Focuses on market opportunities presented by fiber-optic (FO) lighting for electric contractors. Reduction of concerns about installation problems; Factors driving the use of FO lighting; System components; Materials used in FO cabling; Terms and concepts of FO technology. INSET: HOW AN...

  • Last-chance agreement can head off discrimination suit.  // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Dec2012, Vol. 6 Issue 12, p3 

    The article focuses on the court case depicting the last-chance agreement focused on suing for discrimination in the U.S.

  • Igen (formerly Leeds Careers Guidance) and others v Wong; Chamberlin Solicitors v Emokpae; Webster v Brunel University. Smith, Karen; Robinson, Sophy // Employers Law;May2005, p10 

    Focuses on the decisions of the British Court of Appeal regarding shift in the burden of proof in discrimination cases. Factors to consider by a tribunal when considering discrimination cases; Advice on defending a claim of discrimination.

  • Overstaffed? Take logical approach to job cuts.  // HR Specialist: Texas Employment Law;Dec2012, Vol. 7 Issue 12, p1 

    The article discusses the court case Mack v. Wortham, which deals on the reduction in labor force which was a pretext for race and age discrimination.

  • Planning layoffs? Check age demographics before and after proposed RIF.  // HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law;Oct2011, Vol. 4 Issue 10, p3 

    The article discusses the Minnesota court case James Peterson v. Seagate, which deals with discrimination lawsuit and implementation of involuntary reduction in force (RIF).

  • Manager to African American worker: 'Do as I say, not as I do'.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;10/17/2014, Vol. 10 Issue 227, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. court case Johnson v. Long Island University, related to racial discrimination on job with an African American man as of October 2014, in which court reviewed the case and denied the allegation of discrimination.

  • EMPLOYMENT & LABOR LAW. Tanick, Marshall H. // Bench & Bar of Minnesota;Oct2011, Vol. 68 Issue 9, p37 

    The article focuses on various court cases related to employment and labor in Minnesota. In the case EEOC v. Minn. Dept. of Corrections, it was held by the appellate court "arbitrary age discrimination" without meeting the "safe harbor" requirement is constituted by a reduction in benefits based...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics