TITLE

COBRA Benefits Cannot Be Denied, Despite Concurrent Coverage

AUTHOR(S)
Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E.
PUB. DATE
October 1998
SOURCE
Workforce;Oct98, Vol. 77 Issue 10, p120
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the court case filed by James Geissal, a former employee of Moore Medical Corp. to a United States district court against the company for allegedly violating the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). Allegations of Geissal against the company; Court's decision on the matter.
ACCESSION #
1181730

 

Related Articles

  • Judge denies damages in COBRA case. Geisel, Jerry // Business Insurance;4/16/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 16, p3 

    Reports that United States Magistrate Judge David Noyce has rejected the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) claim of the estate of James Geissal against Moore Medical Corp. Case background; Court's basis for its decision.

  • COBRA: AVAILABILITY OF COBRA WHEN OTHER COVERAGE EXISTS. Heese, Katherine A.; MacKenzie Ehrens, Doris R. // Benefits Quarterly;1999 Second Quarter, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p54 

    The article presents the case of James Geissal, an employee at Moore Medical Corp. for filing a suit against his employer alleging a Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) violation by denying him continued coverage under the group health plan. It points out that an...

  • Cases.  // Journal of Criminal Law;Jun2007, Vol. 71 Issue 3, pv 

    The article presents a list of court cases.

  • 'Roe' Must Stand.  // Progressive;Mar89, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p6 

    Focuses on the court cases 'Roe v. Wade' and 'Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.' Details of the cases; Choice of abortion.

  • Scotland: no more rapist cross-examining victims. Manzano, Angie; Eastlick, Megan // Off Our Backs;Nov2000, Vol. 30 Issue 10, p3 

    Reports on the proposal to close the legal loophole that allows men on trial for rape to cross-examine their victims in court in Scotland.

  • PRIMARY RESIDENCE.  // Landlord v. Tenant;Jun2010, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p8 

    The article offers information regarding a case wherein a landlord sued to evict rent-stabilized tenant for nonprimary residence, proving that tenant spent less that 183 days per year in the apartment for six years.

  • A Trend Toward Settlement. Beck, Teresa // Woman Advocate;Fall2012, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p29 

    The author talks about the case litigation and the trend of resolving cases without a trial.

  • The Advantages of a Diverse Trial Team. Jacobsen, Allison A. // Trial Evidence;2011, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p2 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience of having a diverse trial team and its advantages.

  • Court: Slow start for optional e-filing. Hoskins, Michael W. // Indiana Lawyer;9/29/2010, Vol. 21 Issue 15, p15 

    The article announces that the fully implemented but optional e-filing for civil collections and mortgage foreclosure cases by the Marion Superior Courts has a slow start.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics