Hubert, Mitch
October 2003
Fire Chief;Oct2003, Vol. 47 Issue 10, p60
Trade Publication
Compares Class A and Class B fire extinguishing foams. Formulation; Active chemical agents; Effectiveness.


Related Articles

  • AT THE FOAM FOREFRONT.  // Fire Chief;Oct2003, Vol. 47 Issue 10, p56 

    Profiles Clarence Grady, foaming systems manager for Pierce Manufacturing Inc. Education and personal background; Training in fire protection; Expertise in foam technology for fire extinguishing; Career highlights.

  • Low environmental impact halon alternative.  // International Fire & Security Product News;Oct2004, Vol. 29 Issue 5, p22 

    Features the 3M Novec 1230 Fire Protection Fluid, a fire extinguishing agent available from Macron Safety Systems. Types of industries and companies in which the product is expected to appeal; Claims about the technology used in Novec 1230 fluid; Description of the product.

  • Environmentally friendly extinguishing agent.  // International Fire & Security Product News;Aug2003, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p26 

    Reports on the launching of Hygood Novec fire extinguishing agent by Macron Safety Systems in Great Britain. Applications for the agent; Features of the agent; Statement issued by manager Andrew Shinner on the agent.

  • Fire prevention and suppression system.  // International Fire & Security Product News;Aug2003, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p28 

    Reports on the fire extinguishing agents developed by FirePASS Corp. in Great Britain. Component of the agents; Percentage of oxygen contained in the agent for fire suppression.

  • Sealability Properties of Fluorine-Free Fire-Fighting Foams (FfreeF). Ted Schaefer; Bogdan Dlugogorski; Eric Kennedy // Fire Technology;Sep2008, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p297 

    Abstract  This contribution compares the sealability performance of recently developed three synthetic foam formulations (that do not contain fluorosurfactants or fluoropolymers) with that of an aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). We apply the sealability methodology outlined in the...

  • Bubbles Still Beat Water. Wilmoth, Janet // Fire Chief;May2007, Vol. 51 Issue 5, pFF3 

    The author reflects on the effectiveness of foam methods in extinguishing fires in the U.S. She campaigned for the use of the foam method due to its numerous benefits and added that it does not require high maintenance due to the entry of modern technology and state of the art equipment. She...

  • HotFoam outperforms CO[sub 2] systems.  // Offshore;Jul2001, Vol. 61 Issue 7, p110 

    Compares the effectiveness of using carbon dioxide systems and HotFoam systems in extinguishing fires in enclosed spaces. Information on the HotFoam System developed by Svenska Skum company; Problems related to the use of carbon dioxide systems in fire fighting; Comparison of the storage...

  • Our Department Has Class A Foam; Now What? Cotner, Jeff // Fire Engineering;Jul2007, Vol. 160 Issue 7, p121 

    The article reports on the use of foam systems in firefighting, how these systems work, and what Class A foam is. Class A foam reduces surface tension and allows water to penetrate Class A fuels more quickly. Firefighters must know their foam system's operation and performance levels. Compressed...

  • Foam for All. Cavette, Chris // Fire Chief;Nov2006, Vol. 50 Issue 11, p126 

    The article presents information on the usage of foam to extinguish fire. All sizes of foam pumpers can be used to tame more kinds of fire than water pumpers. Those cars that use ethanol-based fuels need alcohol-resistant foams to extinguish fire in case of highway accidents. Small leaks or...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics