TITLE

Complexity requires unqualified expertise

AUTHOR(S)
Friedman, Douglas I.
PUB. DATE
September 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;9/28/98, Vol. 102 Issue 39, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the implication of the changes in the United States Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Development of the pension market; ERISA-related work; Fiduciary liability of funding choices; Skills necessary for the pension market.
ACCESSION #
1176802

 

Related Articles

  • Retirees get day in court. Anand, Vineeta // Pensions & Investments;11/28/1994, Vol. 22 Issue 24, p19 

    Reports on the status of litigation on the tax-favored status of pension plans in the United States. Debate on the specific language of plan documents; Supreme Court decision on lawsuit against Curtiss-Wright Corp. by retirees; Responsibility of company officials in changing provisions;...

  • Information on Enhanced Retirement Benefits for Law Enforcement Personnel. Larence, Eileen // GAO Reports;7/30/2009, preceding p1 

    The article presents information about a report on the procedures used to provide enhanced retirement benefits to federal law enforcement personnel in the U.S. and the costs for extending these benefits to other professions. The report was prepared by the U.S. Government Accountability Office...

  • Bill to Allow 401(k) Advice Moving. Staples, Edward // Advisor Today;Aug2000, Vol. 95 Issue 8, p32 

    Focuses on the Retirement Security Advice Act which aims to permit employers to provide their employees with access to investment advice from registered investment providers in the United States. Views of John Boehner of the House Workforce Employer-Employee Relations Subcommittee on the...

  • Legislature Still Unsure Of OPEB Funding. Burdette, Whitney // State Journal (WV);7/15/2011, Vol. 27 Issue 27, p1 

    The article reports on the uncertainty of the Legislature in West Virginia over funding sources to proceed with the Senate Bill 616 which seeks to fix a shortfall in other post-employment benefits (OPEB).

  • The learning curve. Kirk, Kenneth; Stern, Amy Caplan // Electrical World;Mar1995, Vol. 209 Issue 3, p12 

    Reports on the detrimental effects of 1993 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) on executive retirement benefits. Use of nonqualified `excess plans' by companies to counter OBRA; Drawbacks of nonqualified plans; Advantage of life-insurance financing.

  • Bill Exempting Some Feds From Retirement Tax Penalty Heads to Obama.  // Government Executive;6/25/2015, p1 

    The article focuses on the legislative bill H.R. 2146, passed by the U.S. Senate that will allow the tapping of retirement savings at age 50 without penalty by federal law enforcement officers.

  • Armstead Takes Issue with Component of OPEB Bill. Burdette, Whitney // State Journal (WV);2/10/2012, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p13 

    The article discusses the concerns of Minority Leader Tim Armstead over the proposed Senate Bill 469, the other post employment benefit (OPEB) liability bill in West Virginia.

  • ERISA rule could ease liability concerns. Lee, Karen // Employee Benefit News;May2002, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p51 

    Presents information on employers seeking financial advice on offering retirement plan to employees in the U.S. Background of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act; Information on how to monitor the duties of the investment manager; Comparison between the motivated and reluctant investors.

  • Does Uncle Sam owe you money? Carmona, Jose L. // Caribbean Business;6/1/2000, Vol. 28 Issue 21, p19 

    Reports on the passage of the Senior Citizen's Freedom to Work Act of 2000, which changes the law that determines Social Security (SS) benefits for senior citizens in the United States. Elimination of the SS retirement earnings test (RET) for individuals 65 years or older; Reduction of the RET...

  • THE HIDDEN NATURE OF EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PAY. Jackson Jr., Robert J.; Honigsberg, Colleen // Virginia Law Review;May2014, Vol. 100 Issue 3, p479 

    THERE are two competing theories of why public companies pay executives generous retirement benefits. One is that retirement pay is easier to hide from shareholders than other forms of compensation. The other is that retirement benefits align executives' interests with those of long-term...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics