TITLE

Texas members can sue HMOs, court rules

AUTHOR(S)
Bell, Allison
PUB. DATE
September 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;9/28/98, Vol. 102 Issue 39, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that a federal judge in Houston, Texas has handed down a ruling upholding the states' liability law. Patient's right to sue a health maintenance organization; Court's use of the Supreme Court's 1995 liability case.
ACCESSION #
1176786

 

Related Articles

  • Several proposed bills would hold HMOs to higher standards of accountability.  // Insurance Advocate;06/07/97, Vol. 108 Issue 23, p23 

    Focuses on proposed bills that would hold health maintenance organizations (HMOs) accountable for the consequences of their decisions regarding the amount of health care provided or denied to a subscriber. New York Senator Guy J. Velella's bill that would prohibit HMOs from retaliating against...

  • Bridging the gap. Tschida, Molly // Modern Physician;Jun99, Vol. 3 Issue 6, p50 

    Reports that liability legislation on health maintenance organizations has faced opposition from the United States Congress. Information on Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974; Two states with laws overriding the ERISA; Details on the 1997 case of Bridgett Giles; Impact of...

  • Vicarious Liability: Relocating Responsibility For The Quality Of Medical Care. Havighurst, Clark C. // American Journal of Law & Medicine;2000, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p7 

    Suggests a legal reform that would more clearly establish the ultimate responsibility of health plans for the quality of the services their enrollees receive. Recommendation of legislation establishing a `default rule'; Liability of a health plan for medical malpractice and other torts...

  • Prescribing responsibility: The latest debate about HMOs. Barth, Marianne // San Diego Business Journal;08/03/98, Vol. 19 Issue 31, p27 

    Opinion. Comments on the legislative debate on the responsibility of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in the United States, as illustrated in the case of Melody Johnson. Johnson's death due to cystic fibrosis; Accountability of the HMO which handled Johnson's case; Proposed creation of...

  • CORPORATE HEALTH INSURANCE INC. v. THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INDURANCE: IS THE TEXAS ACT HOLDING HMOs LIABLE FOR SUBSTANDARD MEDICAL CARE PREEMPTED BY ERISA? Adler, Francine S. // St. John's Law Review;Winter2000, Vol. 74 Issue 1, p209 

    Asserts that the section of the Texas Act on the liability of health maintenance organizations should be made on a case-by-case basis. Preemption analysis of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; Impact of the Texas Act on Texas and other jurisdictions.

  • Health Care Risk Mgrs. Face New Liabilities. Levin, Amanda // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;10/11/99, Vol. 103 Issue 41, p33 

    Presents the views of Karin Lindgren of Williams and Montgomery Ltd. on the United States Supreme Court case, Pegram versus Herdrich, which might expose health maintenance organizations to liabilities. Details on the bills signed by California Governor Gray Davis that give patients the right to...

  • HMO law to benefit patients. G.A. // AHA News;9/11/95, Vol. 31 Issue 37, p2 

    Reports on New York State's new health maintenance organization (HMO) law which increases patients' access to health care insurance and indirectly benefit hospitals. Requirement for HMOs to offer standardized, comprehensive managed care plan to purchasers of individual policies; Limits set by...

  • Rural health access bill introduced.  // AHA News;2/17/97, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p6 

    Reports on the introduction of a bill in Utah that would allow health maintenance organization (HMO) members in rural areas to seek treatment from nonparticipating hospitals and physicians. Requirement of HMOs to pay hospitals and doctors outside of their networks the same rate they pay...

  • Provider choice measure fails. Ceniceros, Roberto // Business Insurance;11/10/97, Vol. 31 Issue 46, p96 

    Reports that in Washington (State) during the week of November 3, 1997, voters rejected a measure that would have required health plans to reimburse a provider that delivered covered services to a participant. Identification of the measure; Other provisions of the measure; Groups which opposed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics