Crabtree, Susan
December 2003
Daily Variety;12/11/2003, Vol. 281 Issue 48, p10
Trade Publication
Reports on the decision of the Supreme Court to uphold the provisions of the campaign finance reform laws in Washington D.C. Impact of the move on the ban on soft money and restrictions on broadcast issue ads; Reaffirmation of the congress' ability to regulate campaign finance; Effects of the decision on corporate contributions to political parties.


Related Articles

  • ASS BACKWARD. Kuttner, Robert // New Republic;4/22/85, Vol. 192 Issue 17, p19 

    Comments on the campaign finance of the Democratic Party. View that the party's millionaire supporters may confuse the party's message; Impact of the loopholes in campaign finance law explored by party lawyers and interest groups on Democrats; Report that in 1984 Democrats raised more soft money...

  • Fund limits voided.  // State Government News;Oct2000, Vol. 43 Issue 9, p7 

    Reveals that Missouri political parties have won a battle over the state's limit on campaign contributions. Provision of the parties' 1994 First Amendment law; Amount of limited contributions upheld by the United States Supreme Court.

  • Soft Money; Hard Problems.  // Junior Scholastic;01/17/2000, Vol. 102 Issue 11, p13 

    Presents arguments on whether soft-money contributions to political parties corrupt the United States democratic system.

  • Donations to political parties. Fisher, Justin // Parliamentary Affairs;Apr97, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p235 

    Discusses the donations of money to political parties in Britain. Primary concerns about voluntary donations to parties; Variation in the prominence and type of voluntary donations; Secrecy surrounding how the Conservative party collect campaign funds; History of individual funding in Britain.

  • Groups raking in the cash. Joseph, Cameron // Hill;12/2/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 166, p3 

    The article reports on the investigation made by "The Hill" publication which revealed that political groups from the left and right have already spent around 35 million dollars to shape the result of the 2012 election in the U.S.

  • Sketch. Pearce, Edward // New Statesman & Society;5/19/95, Vol. 8 Issue 353, p13 

    Features Lord Nolan and his committee report on British political parties' funds. House of Commons as guardian of its own standards; Nolan's views on money in politics; Ban placed on Members of Parliament (MP) working for lobbyists; Sources of party funding.

  • Washington watch. Albiniak, Paige; McConnell, Bill // Broadcasting & Cable;06/28/99, Vol. 129 Issue 27, p15 

    Reports on developments related to the United States government's policies on broadcasting as of June 28, 1999. Includes research firm Center for Responsive Politics' report focusing on entertainment companies' financial contributions to congressional elections.

  • Washington watch. McConnell, Bill; Albiniak, Paige // Broadcasting & Cable;03/15/99, Vol. 129 Issue 11, p20 

    Reports on developments related to broadcasting policy in the United States as of March 15, 1999. Includes the Media Institute's rating of the government's efforts to uphold First Amendment rights; Political contributions to Republican and Democratic candidates from telecommunications and...

  • Spending lid busted.  // State Government News;Oct99, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p8 

    Reports that a United States district judge voided portions of Colorado's 1996 campaign finance law. Overview of the finance law; Account of a similar court hearing.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics