Instructing the EPA How to Regulate Vehicle Emissions

Dennis-Parks, Reda M.
November 2003
Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p799
Academic Journal
Focuses on the decision of a court of appeals on the case, Ethyl Corp. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, regarding the regulation of vehicle emissions. Facts of the case; Prohibitions under the Clean Air Act; Implications of the decision.


Related Articles

  • Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri; Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes. Brooks, Karl // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;2/20/2013, Vol. 78 Issue 34, p11758 

    A summary is presented of the final rule on emissions of particulate matter from industrial sources, prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on April 22, 2013.

  • Closing the Clean Air Act Loopholes. UKEILEY, ROBERT // Solar Today;Jul/Aug2013, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p14 

    In this article, the author discusses Clean Air Act. He states that by approving the federal Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unintentionally approved loophole to emission limits.

  • State plans must ensure environmental equity for low-income neighborhoods.  // Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder;12/25/2014, Vol. 81 Issue 22, p6 

    The article discusses the comments of the Emerald Cities Collaborative (ECC) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on regulations for section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and how equity for low-income communities of color must be ensured in state plans on carbon emissions.

  • Court ruling on power plant emissions a clean air victory. Krisberg, Kim // Nation's Health;May2006, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p1 

    The article discusses issues related to a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling on power plant emissions. On March 17, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia unanimously ruled in a 3-0 decision that the rule change of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would have produced a...

  • EPA Gives Biomass Three-Year Deferral On Greenhouse Permits. HOLLY, CHRIS // Energy Daily;1/13/2011, Issue 9, p2 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to delay for three years Clean Air Act permitting requirements for carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and industrial facilities using biomass fuels. EPA is reportedly planning to conduct further...

  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;11/9/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 218, p67322 

    The article reports on the proposal by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to approve revisions to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District area of the California State Implementation Plan. The revisions are about oxides of nitrogen emissions from biomass boilers. EPA said it...

  • Epa's Revised New Source Review Regulations Take Effect. Mastroyannis-Zaft, David // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p805 

    Provides an overview of the revisions made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the Clean Air Act's New Source Review regulations. Provisions on emissions and pollution control; Modifications made to the regulations; Changes made on how emission resulting from physical or operational...

  • EPA to again allow penalties to certify diesel engines. Cullen, David // Fleet Owner Blog;8/31/2012, p1 

    The article reports on the issuance of the Final Rule Nonconformance Penalties (NCPs) by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It notes that the final rule allows engine makers to produce and sell heavy-duty diesel engines that do not meet the 2010 nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission limit...

  • Clean Air Act requirements for landfills Repa, Edward W. // Waste Age;Apr1995, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p163 

    No abstract available.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics