TITLE

Tahoe-Sierra, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Moratorium

AUTHOR(S)
Cohen, Benson R.
PUB. DATE
November 2003
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p741
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the case Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, regarding property rights. Facts of the case; Overview of the court's decision; Comparison with other similar cases.
ACCESSION #
11694233

 

Related Articles

  • Takings Formalism and Regulatory Formulas: Exactions and the Consequences of Clarity. Fenster, Mark // California Law Review;May2004, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p611 

    The U.S. Supreme Court's takings jurisprudence may well be, as numerous commentators complain, a confused muddle. Nevertheless, in its most recent takings decision. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, the Court confidently declared that its decisions offered...

  • HITTING THE BRAKES. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Jun2002, Vol. 88 Issue 6, p32 

    Focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case of Tahoe Sierra Preservation Council vs. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency concerning property rights. Claims on land use for the reparation of private property; Land seizure conducted by the government to environmentally protect the...

  • Property Owners Cannot Repeatedly Challenge Regional Planning Process Every Time that Development Permits Are Denied. Mah, Liwen // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p749 

    Emphasizes the right of an association of property owners to challenge regional planning process for limiting development in ecologically sensitive areas. Facts of the Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Supreme Court case; Allegations and arguments of the...

  • Regulatory Takings in the Wake of Tahoe-Sierra and the IOLTA Decision. Roberts, Thomas E. // Urban Lawyer;Fall2003, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p759 

    Reviews the Supreme Court decision in the regulatory takings claim case Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington, and its implication for land use law. Background of the case; Reference to the case Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; Examination into the...

  • HOW THE HISTORY AND PURPOSE OF THE REGULATORY TAKINGS DOCTRINE HELP TO DEFINE THE PARCEL AS A WHOLE. Siegel, Daniel L. // Vermont Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p603 

    The article examines the U.S. Supreme Court's application of "parcel as a whole" rule in analyzing regulatory taking claims. It analyzes the Court's establishment of the rule in the case Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City and its affirmation of the rule in the case Tahoe-Sierra...

  • TAHOE'S REQUIEM: THE DEATH OF THE SCALIAN VIEW OF PROPERTY AND JUSTICE. Underkuffler, Laura S. // Constitutional Commentary;Winter2004, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p727 

    The article explores the death of the idea of property as a concrete, objectively knowable and immutable legal barrier which marks the boundary between individual interests and government power based on the views of U.S. Chief Justice Antonin Scalia. The role of the Supreme Court cases Palazzolo...

  • Court Decision Liberates Tahoe Planning.  // Planning;Jun2002, Vol. 68 Issue 6, p32 

    Reports on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Tahoe Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) on planning in the U.S. Information on the compact between California and Nevada; Number of residents in South Lake Tahoe; Evaluation program...

  • Regulatory Takings: Correcting the Supreme Court's Wrong Turn in Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. Pack, Bryan J. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2003, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p391 

    Details the U.S. Supreme Court case Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency on the limits of the regulatory takings doctrines arising from the Fifth Amendment. Discussion of several rules applicable in protecting the landowners involved; Expansion of the...

  • New Developments in Regulatory Takings: The Supreme Court Takes an Interest in the Fee Simple Estate. Duvall, Richard O.; Black, David S. // Appraisal Journal;Jul2002, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p241 

    Provides information on new developments in regulatory takings jurisprudence announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in April 2002 in the case of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. versus Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. Historical development of regulatory takings jurisprudence prior to the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics