"A Breathtaking Assertion of Power"? Not Quite. Pronsolino v. Nastri and the Still Limited Role of Federal Regulation of Nonpoint Source Pollution

Garovoy, Jocelyn B.
November 2003
Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p543
Academic Journal
Explores the role of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to regulate nonpoint source pollution in the case, Pronsolino v. Nastri. Legal background of the U.S. Clean Water Act and its relevance to the nonpoint source pollution; Facts of the case; Economic incentives of adopting solutions to nonpoint source pollution.


Related Articles

  • State Action Limiting Nonpoint Pollution Not Required Under CWA. Stiegler, Mayo H. // Journal: American Water Works Association;Apr2006, Vol. 98 Issue 4, p32 

    The article reports on the non-inclusion of regulatory actions to limit the amount of nonpoint water pollution introduced into waterways in the state requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (NMWQCC) took on revised water quality standards that...

  • Filling the Regulatory Gap: A Proposal for Restructuring the Clean Water Act's Two- Permit System. Moreno, Robert B. // Ecology Law Quarterly;2010, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p285 

    The Clean Water Act (CWA) was passed in response to increased pollution in the nation's navigable waters caused by industrial actors and others. Congress sought to achieve two goals with the CWA: eliminate pollution discharges into the nation's waters, and achieve national uniformity in a water...

  • Clean Water Act may change. McEOWEN, ROGER // Wallaces Farmer;Nov2013, Vol. 138 Issue 11, p59 

    The article discusses the possibility that the Clean Water Act (CWA) in the U.S. could be changed. Topics discussed include difference between point source and nonpoint source pollution, a California lawsuit which involved the exemption of tile drainage systems from CWA, and the Environmental...

  • Addressing Death by a Thousand Cuts: Legal and Policy Innovations to Address Nonpoint Source Runoff. Fowler, Lara B.; Royer, Matthew B.; Colburn, Jamison E. // Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues;2013 3rd Quarter, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p1 

    The article discusses the progress of legal and policy innovations in the U.S. to address nonpoint source runoff and death of a thousand cuts caused by runoff from city streets and farms. Topics include the application of the Clean Water Act which addresses water pollution and aims to restore...

  • States sue EPA over carbon dioxide emissions. Arias, Donya C. // Nation's Health;Aug2003, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p10 

    Reports on the move of three New England states to sue the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in June 2003 in an effort to force the government to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. Basis of the lawsuit; Dangers posed by global warming to the public; Provisions of the Clean Air Act.

  • Court tells EPA to rewrite emissions rule. Toloken, Steve // Plastics News;6/28/2004, Vol. 16 Issue 17, p11 

    A federal court has tossed out part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) emissions standards for PVC manufacturing plants, ruling that the agency failed to set limits for emissions of several hazardous air pollutants. The June 18 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...

  • EPA PROPOSES NEW COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE STANDARDS.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2011 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article focuses on the proposed new rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which would set standards for the cooling water intake structures at most existing facilities. It offers information on the two alternatives that are established in the proposed rule to meet the...

  • SEEKING A SENSIBLE WATER POLICY. Bozek, C. Richard // Electric Perspectives;May/Jun2007, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p136 

    The author discusses the provisions of section 316(b) of the U.S. Clean Water Act. According to the author, Section 316(b) requires that cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. He stated that in 2004, the U.S....

  • CLEAN WATER ACT STILL MURKY. Madison, Adam // Rock Products;Oct2003, Vol. 106 Issue 10, p34 

    Focuses on issues related to the U.S. Clean Water Act as of October 2003. Decision of the Supreme Court on the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus the Army Corps of Engineers in 2001; Discussion on the regulation of all waters that are isolated from navigable waters;...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics