Arizona Cattle Growers Association v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: Has the Ninth Circuit Weakened the "Take" Provisions of the Endangered Species Act?
- Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Receipt of Application for Incidental Take Permit; Availability of Proposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan and Associated Documents; Lee County, FL. Williams, Larry // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;8/2/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 149, p46105
The article presents a notice from the U.S. Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service in 2012. The public notice aims to announce the availability of an incidental take permit (ITP) application and habitat conservation plan (HCP) requested by the city of Cape Coral in Florida under...
- Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. Badgley: Good News for Endangered Species Act Advocates, Bad News for At-Risk Species. Schlotterbeck, Jennifer // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p593
Examines the implications of the court's decision on the case, Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. Badgley, for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Background on the U.S. Endangered Species Act; Facts of the case; Practical implications of the case.
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service adopts interim guidance to prioritize listing actions... Ayres // Army Lawyer;May96, Issue 282, p43
Reports on the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's (FWS) adoptoin of an interim policy to prioritize listing actions under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act. Tiers list.
- Species Listing Moratorium Lifted. // Army Lawyer;Jul96, Issue 284, p33
Reports on the resumption of the listing actions of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act. Proposals for 243 species; Proposals for another 182 candidate species; Designation of categories 1, 2 and 3 species.
- Species rescue. // New Scientist;11/11/95, Vol. 148 Issue 2003, p13
Reports on the statement by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service on the accomplishment of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Increase in the population of the endangered species; Small number of species which have gone extinct; Factors for the relative effectiveness of the act.
- Overview of the legislative mandates and the agencies responsible for implementation of southern sea otter protection under the Endangered Species Act Clark, Jamie Rappaport // Endangered Species Update;Dec1996, Vol. 13 Issue 12, p28
No abstract available.
- Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List 10 Subspecies of Great Basin Butterflies as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat. Siekaniec, Gregory E. // Federal Register;10/4/2011, Vol. 76 Issue 192, p61532
The article announces that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has issued a notice of 90-day petition finding and initiation of status review to list 10 subspecies of Great Basin butterflies in Nevada and California as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
- Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Three Foreign Macaw Species. Gould, Rowan W. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;2/21/2013, Vol. 78 Issue 35, p12011
A summary is presented of the proposed rules on listing three foreign macaw species as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
- Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the Art of Compromise: The Evolution of a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative for the Animas-La Plata Project. Gosnell, Hannah // Natural Resources Journal;Summer2001, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p561
Focuses on section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) implemented by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service which prohibits federal actions to further jeopardize a specie listed under the act. Rationale for the passage of ESA in 1973; Procedural requirements to comply with section 7;...