TITLE

There Is No Lesson to Be learned from the Second Kick by a Mule!

AUTHOR(S)
Brant, Wally
PUB. DATE
November 2003
SOURCE
Gases & Welding Distributor;Nov/Dec2003, Vol. 47 Issue 6, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on issues involving the metal trade and fabrication industry in the U.S. Impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on property and casualty insurance; Attention recognized by the industry about the acetylene plant accidents in Tulsa and Sacramento; Multi-million dollar expenses of the manufacturers for legal defenses; Predictions of insurance experts on another possible terrorist attacks.
ACCESSION #
11568583

 

Related Articles

  • Insurers Scrambling To Comply With New Terrorism Insurance Law. Ha, Michael // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;12/2/2002, Vol. 106 Issue 48, p5 

    Focuses on the impact of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act on property-casualty insurers in the U.S. Provision of federal reinsurance backstop for primary carriers; Absence of specific of policies for the implementation of the legislation; Expectation for a massive increases in premiums.

  • Bush adviser touts P/C industry's role in homeland security. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;1/27/2003, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p4 

    Reports that according to U.S. President George W. Bush's adviser Richard Falkenrath property casualty insurance industry can play a key role in the nation's war against terrorism. Effort of Bush to get the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 enacted; Encouragement to property holders to...

  • Paying Up.  // Business News New Jersey;9/25/2001, Vol. 14 Issue 39, p3 

    Focuses on the impact of terrorist attack on the plans of insurance companies to dismiss the act-of-war exclusion in the United States. Influence of property and casualty policies on the exclusion; Move of Chubb of Warren Township to pay casualty and property damage claims.

  • Upcoming Months Will Provide Better Understanding of Terrorism Risk, RMS Says.  // Insurance Advocate;7/26/2004, Vol. 115 Issue 26, p4 

    Reports on advice from terrorism experts at Risk Management Solutions (RMS). Events that will offer potential targets of opportunity for terrorists both in the United States and abroad; Principles of the RMS Terrorism Risk Model; Involvement of RMS in the modeling of catastrophic risk.

  • Short Memories and Lessons Learned. Gusman, Phil // Insurance Advocate;5/7/2007, Vol. 118 Issue 10, p4 

    The author reflects on the market performance of property and casualty industry in the U.S. He comments that it is time to abandon the short memory concept in facing the industry in areas like natural catastrophes and terrorism. He adds that the industry needs to rise above its cyclical nature...

  • Insurers Can Recalculate Terrorism Risk. Mooney, Sean F. // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;4/29/2002, Vol. 106 Issue 17, p25 

    Discusses the correlation between terrorism risk and the risk-transfer mechanism of insurance. Examples of positive and negative correlations; Implications of the correlations for the capital of insurers.

  • Pricing discipline at risk? Winston, Paul D. // Business Insurance;1/21/2002, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p2 

    Reports the difficulty of the casualty industry of maintaining pricing discipline and prolonging the hard market in New York. Failure of the industry of acquiring relief aid from Congress; Impact of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the industry; Requirements of the industry in sustaining...

  • P-C Carriers Set Marketing Agendas For 2005. Brady, Matt // National Underwriter / P&C;1/3/2005, Vol. 109 Issue 1, p21 

    Reports on marketing agendas of property-casualty insurers in the U.S. for 2005. Marketing of stand-alone terrorism property coverage; Repositioning of carrier in terms of pricing.

  • Don't Go Nuclear! Friedman, Sam // National Underwriter / P&C;7/2/2007, Vol. 111 Issue 26, p5 

    The author reflects on the inclusion of nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (NBCR) insurance coverage into the Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision Act of 2007 in the U.S. The author believes that NBCR coverage is completely unnecessary because it would cost insurers a lot of money,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics