TITLE

Brussels incentives

PUB. DATE
July 2002
SOURCE
Management Services;Jul2002, Vol. 46 Issue 7, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the European Commission's senior staff are being subjected to performance evaluation schemes.
ACCESSION #
11511155

 

Related Articles

  • Misusing feedback. Snader, Jack // Executive Excellence;Aug97, Vol. 14 Issue 8, p4 

    Discusses how the full-circle employee assessment process is widely misused. Employees' attitude towards assessments during downsizing; Use of assessments for raises and promotions; Poor delivery of feedbacks.

  • Investigation of raters' and ratees' reactions to three methods of performance appraisal: BOS... Tziner, Aharon; Kopelman, Richard; Joanis, Christine // Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (Canadian Journal of;Dec97, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p396 

    Investigates approaches in rating of employees. Goal properties of behavior-based appraisals; Empirical evidences from other studies; Comparison of three methods of performance appraisal; Attitude of employees toward methods of appraisal.

  • How to: Provide effective feedback.  // People Management;07/11/96, Vol. 2 Issue 14, p44 

    Explains ways and methods of providing a constructive criticism to employees as part of performance appraisal. Goal of providing feedback; Basic principles of effective feedback that can be applied within the formal and informal context; Different approach of feedback which is provided in...

  • Improve your performance appraisals. Gershkovich, Karen // Across the Board;Jul/Aug97, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p63 

    Suggests tips in improving employee performance. Impact of performance appraisals on employees; What managers must do during appraisal.

  • Don't skip the comments. Eidson, Christy // Across the Board;Nov/Dec98, Vol. 35 Issue 10, p62 

    Discusses the benefit of offering honest rating in an employee's shortcomings during performance evaluation. How the shorten comments in rating an employee.

  • Improving performance appraisal. Goodale, James G. // Business Quarterly;Autumn92, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p65 

    Presents guidelines to help managers improve the performance appraisal of employees. Common complaints of employees about appraisals; Involving managers and their employees in the design of the system; Making the objectives of the appraisal clear and placing proper emphasis on each; Focusing...

  • Multi-dimensional assessment plans are catching on.  // Corporate Board;May/June97, Vol. 18 Issue 104, p28 

    Reports on companies' use of multisource assessment (MSA) to evaluate employee performance and for individual development. Broadening of appraisal process; Multisource assessment for higher-level employees; Observations from Mercer consultant David Bracken.

  • Conducting a comprehensive labor force study: One area-wide experience. Lackey, Susan A. // Economic Development Review;Winter92, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p29 

    Examines the process of assessing labor force skills and availability in the twin cities metropolitan area in Minnesota. Wage rates; Fears about long-term labor supply; Labor-management climate; Change from a blue collar community to a white collar town; Participation in the labor force based on...

  • Ensure employee accountability: Documentation is key. Riddell, Don // Nation's Restaurant News;3/4/96, Vol. 30 Issue 9, p36 

    Opinion. Focuses on employee accountability in the United States. Disciplinary action against employees; Termination of employees; Objective of documenting employee performance.

  • Keeping score. Ridilla, Paul // Plumbing & Mechanical;Nov95, Vol. 12 Issue 9, p14 

    Focuses on keeping score of good employees. Justifications for keeping score; Documentation of mistakes; Correlation with raises and promotions; Communication changes.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics