TITLE

Flexible Friends For The Railway

AUTHOR(S)
Clark, Rhodri
PUB. DATE
January 2002
SOURCE
Logistics & Transport Focus;Jan/Feb2002, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p67
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The complex and expensive privatization of the British Rail (BR) was publicly justified on the grounds that it would introduce free-market economics to the rail network. Rail freight in Great Britain is rapidly developing. A few ambitious companies have even fought their way to the customer interface, offering valuable alternatives to the established sources of rolling stock. BR's passenger stock was divided between three companies. In practice they do not hire trains to operators, although there is an element of competition for orders of new trains. BR's freight equipment was packaged with the freight businesses for privatization but five of the six freight companies went to one buyer. INSETS: A Million Hurdles To Clear.;The Downside of Competition.;In the Right Place at the Right Time..
ACCESSION #
11510977

 

Related Articles

  • Dear old British Rail. Norris, Steve // Prospect;Feb2014, Issue 215, p10 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "What if... British Rail had never been privatised" by Christian Wolmar in the January 2014 issue.

  • Brakes on the gravy train. Wolmar, Christian // Public Finance;05/28/99, p24 

    Reports that the Great Britain's Labour government has been left to work out British Rail Corp.'s subsidies. Previous Conservative government's railway privatization; Row over the future of the rail industry; Difference from previous conflicts between the British Rail Board and the Department...

  • Yankees press plan to deliver freight despite Britain's complex privatization. Burke, Jack // Traffic World;12/11/95, Vol. 244 Issue 11, p22 

    Focuses on the complexity of privatizing British Rail Corp. End result of the privatization process; Possibility that a change in government will end and even reverse the process; Interest of American companies in taking over freight operations of the system; Issue on the selection of...

  • Three's company. SHANNON, PAUL // Railways Illustrated;May2014, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p36 

    The article discusses the founding and short life of the amalgamated rail companies in 1996 including Loadhaul, Mainline Freight, and Transrail. The three companies were created to promote competition for the British Railways bulk freight operation. It reveals that the companies were formed to...

  • Is nationalisation really the answer? Wolmar, Christian // New Statesman;12/25/2000, Vol. 129 Issue 4518, p16 

    Discusses the government plan to nationalize the railways industry in Great Britain. Estimated cost of the nationalization plan; Concerns about the component parts of the British Rail; Reason behind the privatization of the railways.

  • Competition in the rail industry. Bradshaw, WP // Oxford Review of Economic Policy;Spring97, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p93 

    Describes method of privatization of railways in Great Britain. Competitive pressure on railways; Tensions between Rail Regulator and other players in the industry; Passage of the Railways Act of 1993; Centralized wage bargaining arrangements of British Rail.

  • PRIVATE TRAINS: HEADING FOR THE BUFFERS? Purkiss, Alan // Accountancy;Oct92, Vol. 110 Issue 1190, p30 

    Discusses the negative impact of Charterail's demise on the British government's entire rail privatization strategy. Doubt on British Rail's commitment to the private sector; Probable bidders for passenger service franchises; Performance of the four regional companies in Great Britain.

  • IN BOX.  // Railways Illustrated;Mar2013, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p90 

    Several letters to the editor and a reply are presented in response to articles in the previous issues on topics regarding the 47798 Prince William locomotive of the National Railway Museum, and the action of the British Rail (BR) and privatisation changes to traincrew. INSET: From our twitter...

  • Don't mention the 'n' word. Macwhirter, Iain // Public Finance;12/01/2000, p5 

    Comments on the debate over the privatization of the British Rail. Disagreement between the Labour Party and the Tories; Railtrack's positive performance on the stock market; Disruption that has accompanied Railtrack's belated attempts to restore the integrity of its infrastructure.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics