Procedural Justice and Affirmative Action

Meshelski, Kristina
April 2016
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Apr2016, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p425
Academic Journal
There is widespread agreement among both supporters and opponents that affirmative action either must not violate any principle of equal opportunity or procedural justice, or if it does, it may do so only given current extenuating circumstances. Many believe that affirmative action is morally problematic, only justified to the extent that it brings us closer to the time when we will no longer need it. In other words, those that support affirmative action believe it is acceptable in nonideal theory, but not ideal theory. This paper argues that affirmative action is entirely compatible with equal opportunity and procedural justice and would be even in an ideal world. I defend a new analysis of Rawlsian procedural justice according to which it is permissible to interfere in the outcomes of procedures, and thus I show that affirmative action is not morally problematic in the way that many have supposed.


Related Articles

  • Tailored Affirmative Action Allowed in Higher Education. Smith, Allen // HR Magazine;Aug2013, Vol. 58 Issue 8, p8 

    The article reports on the outcome of the legal case Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of affirmative action in college admissions will be continually allowed in 2013 as long as it has tailored the program to reap the benefits of diversity.

  • A Fair Shake. Arnett, Autumn A. // Diverse: Issues in Higher Education;8/13/2015, Vol. 32 Issue 14, p12 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to once again take up the case Fisher v. University of Texas, which raises again the question of the necessity for and legality of affirmative action. It cites the claim of assistant professor Donald Mitchell on the need for...

  • Diversity Policies Revisited. Cline, Seth // U.S. News Digital Weekly;10/12/2012, Vol. 4 Issue 41, p9 

    The article discusses the arguments heard by the U.S. Supreme court on the case Fisher v. University of Texas (UT) involving affirmative action in college admissions. It describes the university's policy of considering race as a non-academic criterion for admissions and the claims made by a...

  • Supreme Court returns affirmative action case to lower court. Sulton, Anne T. // Jackson Advocate;6/27/2013, Vol. 75 Issue 38, p1A 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to rule on a request in the court case Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin regarding the legal aspect of the affirmative action program of the university.

  • Affirmative Action Returns to the Supreme Court. Russo, Charles J. // School Business Affairs;Oct2016, Vol. 82 Issue 9, p33 

    The article looks at the debate over affirmative action and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v. University of Texas (UT) II to uphold the defendant's reliance on race in admissions to achieve diversity. Topics covered include history of the 2016 case, Texas' Top Ten Percent Law, UT's...

  • After Fisher: Academic Review and Judicial Scrutiny. La Noue, George R. // Academic Questions;Dec2013, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p403 

    In this article the author discusses outcomes of the case "Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin," in which the plaintiff had accused the University of Texas (UT) for racial discrimination in the admission process. The author believes that ruling of the court in this case makes it harder to...

  • Affirmative Action and the Mockery of Jewish Tradition. Rozansky, Jeremy // Commentary;Oct2012, Vol. 134 Issue 3, p60 

    The article explores the relationship between affirmative action and Judaism. According to the author, affirmative action is not in the best interest of Jews, is unjust, and violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th amendment's equal-protection clause. In addition, he discusses the 2012 U.S. Supreme...

  • The University of Texas at Austin's Defense of Affirmative Action in Fisher v. University of Texas: Lessons for Institutional Policies and Practices. Garces, Liliana M. // AMAE Journal;2015, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p73 

    In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court most recently recognized the right of universities to pursue a mission-centered interest in the educational benefits of student body diversity. The decision, however, also reminded institutions of the limited ways they are...

  • ACTION AFFIRMED. JUDIS, JOHN B. // New Republic;7/15/2013, Vol. 244 Issue 11, p9 

    The article profiles activist Richard Kahlenberg, a supporter of replacing race-based affirmative action in higher education with affirmative action based on class and economics. Topics include the 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas, Kahlenberg's argument...

  • FISHER v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: THE LEGACY OF GRUTTER AND THE POWER OF DIVERSITY IN STEM DEGREE PROGRAMS. Rabin, Kevin S. // Journal of Technology Law & Policy;2014, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p289 

    The article addresses how the decision of the Fifth Circuit in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin and Supreme Court's review of said case on appeal affected the Court's affirmative action jurisprudence. Topics discussed include the history of affirmative action in higher education decisions...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics