Husserl and Foucault on the historical apriori: teleological and anti-teleological views of history

Carr, David
March 2016
Continental Philosophy Review;Mar2016, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p127
Academic Journal
It is well known that Husserl and Foucault use the striking phrase 'the historical apriori' at certain key points in their work. Yet most commentators agree that the two thinkers mean very different things by this expression, and the question is why these two authors would employ the same terms for such different purposes. Instead of pursuing this question directly I want to look from a broader perspective at the views of history that are reflected in the different uses of this expression. Husserl and Foucault may be said to represent teleological and anti-teleological views of history respectively. Foucault often says that phenomenology represents the view to which he is most opposed, and in most of these remarks it is the subject-centered character of phenomenology to which he most objects. But I think he also sees Husserl as the latest representative of a teleological view of history and of knowledge that descends from Hegel and the enlightenment and is characteristic of modernity as a whole. Foucault's work mounts a full-scale attack on this view of history, and this is one of the ways in which Foucault's thought contrasts with Husserl's. I argue that Foucault's view is anti-teleological rather than simply non-teleological, since almost invariably he develops his view by uprooting the assumptions of his opponents. At the end of the paper I come back to the expression 'historical apriori,' as used by Husserl and Foucault, and discuss it briefly in light of what I have said.


Related Articles

  • Human Sacrifice Today. Cordero, Ronald // Journal of Value Inquiry;Jun2008, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p203 

    The article explores the concept of human sacrifice and its practice in the modern society. It talks about the need to understand the acceptance of regrettable loss in the analysis of the concept of sacrifice. The moral justification for human sacrifice with the use of a consequentialist theory...

  • Structures of normative theories. Dreier, James // Monist;Jan93, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p22 

    Addresses the questions about the agent neutral/agent centered distinction. Consequentializing strategy; Stigma of consequentialism; Kinds of metaethical theory; Metaethical justifications and normative structure; Ideal observer theories; Contract theories; Virtue ethics; How moral theory...

  • Deontology and agency. McNaughton, David; Rawling, Piers // Monist;Jan93, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p81 

    Advocates an agent-relative characterization of constraints. Agent-focused rationale for constraints; Agent-focused/agent-relativity; Consequentialism; Agent-relative (AR); Agent-neutral (AN); Contrasts between patient/victim-focused and agent-focused; Principle of (Im)Permissible Harm (PI/PH).

  • Parfit's Repugnant conclusion. Ryberg, Jesper // Philosophical Quarterly;Apr96, Vol. 46 Issue 183, p201 

    Criticizes an argument that tried to disclose an analytical shortcoming in consequentialist reasoning. Anti-consequentialist line of reasoning; Accommodation of the S principle; Why critics of consequentialism may advert to the analytical failings of consequentialist doctrines; John Finnis'...

  • Is Hypocrisy a Problem for Consequentialism? Shaw, William H. // Utilitas;Nov99, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p340 

    Expresses doubts on the argument made by Eldon Soifer and Bela Szabados on the failure of consequentialism to account for the wrongness of hypocritical conduct in a 1998 issue of 'Utilitas.' Ability of consequentialism to account for hypocrisy; Kinds and degrees of hypocrisy; Motives,...

  • Impartiality and Associative Duties. Brink, David O. // Utilitas;Jul2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p152 

    Focuses on the ability of consequentialism to accommodate associational duties and impartiality. Plausibility of associational duties; Determination of the intellectual net of consequentialism; Promotion of good violates to others.

  • Immodest Consequentialism and Character. Smith, Michael // Utilitas;Jul2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p173 

    Focuses on the value of various traits of character in consequentialism. Distinction between modest and immodest version of consequentialism; Nature of consequentialism; Problems associated with modest global consequentialism.

  • Vices as Higher-level Evils. Hurka, Thomas // Utilitas;Jul2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p195 

    Focuses on the account of intrinsic goodness of virtue and intrinsic evil of vice within a consequentialist framework. General features of consequentialism; Distinction between pure vices and vices of disproportion; Definition of virtue.

  • Virtue Ethics, Value-centredness, and Consequentialism. Swanton, Christine // Utilitas;Jul2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p213 

    Focuses on the major features of consequentialist conceptions of virtue. Distinction between values and virtue; Modes of moral responsiveness constitutive of virtue; Difference between the conception of virtue by virtue ethicists and consequentialists.

  • Agent-neutral Consequentialism from the Inside-out: Concern for Integrity without Self-indulgence. Ridge, Michael // Utilitas;Jul2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p236 

    Focuses on the failure of consequentialists to accommodate the ways agents show concern for integrity. Approaches to moral theory; Discussion on the concept of inside-out approach; Plausibility of the inside-out approach.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics