How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A crosssectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors

Elia, Nadia; von Elm, Erik; Chatagner, Alexandra; Pöpping, Daniel M.; Tramèr, Martin R.
March 2016
BMJ Open;2016, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p1
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a crosssectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews. Piehl, Janet H.; Green, Sally; McDonald, Steve // BMC Health Services Research;2003, Vol. 3, p2 

    Background: Despite the growing reputation and subject coverage of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, many systematic reviews continue to be published solely in paper-based health care journals. This study was designed to determine why authors choose to publish their systematic reviews...

  • Systematic review -- a method for nursing research. Holopainen, Arja; Hakulinen-Viitanen, Tuovi; Tossavainen, Kerttu // Nurse Researcher;2008, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p72 

    This article by Arja Holopainen, Tuovi Hakulinen-Viitanen and Kerttu Tossavainen explains the five stages of the systematic review process and describes how this method was applied to an analysis of studies dealing with nurse 'teacherhood'. The authors argue that systematic review is an...

  • Deaths after Chiropractic: Serious Irregularities Persist. Morley, Joseph J.; Grunnet-Nilsson, Niels; Rosner, Anthony L.; Kinsler, Brett; Wenban, Adrian // Journal of the American Chiropractic Association;Jan2012, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p23 

    The article presents a commentary on the systematic review article "Deaths after Chiropractic: A Review of Published Cases,” by Edzard Ernst, with particular focus on the research methodology. The authors argue that Ernst's article contains evidence of research misconduct and bias,...

  • Training practitioners in preparing systematic reviews: a cross-sectional survey of participants in the Australasian Cochrane Centre training program. Piehl, Janet H.; Green, Sally; Silagy, Chris // BMC Health Services Research;2002, Vol. 2, p11 

    Background: Although systematic reviews of health care interventions are an invaluable tool for health care providers and researchers, many potential authors never publish reviews. This study attempts to determine why some people with interest in performing systematic reviews do not subsequently...

  • Reviews: Making Sense of an Often Tangled Skein of Evidence.  // Annals of Internal Medicine;6/21/2005, Vol. 142 Issue 12, p1019 

    This article offers advice for review artisans who hope to see their wires on display in the journal. In an accompanying supplement sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, authors from the North American Evidence-based Practice Centers offer detailed advice on how to do...

  • Editors Talk to Each Other. Roulet, J. F.; Van Meerbeek, B. // Journal of Adhesive Dentistry;2013, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p3 

    The authors focus on systematic publication, or the use of the same data in creating multiple, similar articles. They comment that if a specific methodology was developed to answer important research questions and if it is referenced property, then there is no problem in using the methodology to...

  • Diabetes risk increased between spouses. Chaput, Jean-Philippe // Evidence Based Nursing;Jan2015, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p28 

    The author discusses the study on spousal diabetes concordance in meta-analysis and systematic review. The study involves cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies which examines spousal association for prediabetes or diabetes wherein a total of 75,498 couples were included in...

  • Tutorial for writing systematic reviews for the Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT). Mancini, Marisa C.; Cardoso, Jefferson R.; Sampaio, Rosana F.; Costa, Lucíola C. M.; Cabral, Cristina M. N.; Costa, Leonardo O. P. // Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy / Revista Brasileira de Fi;Nov/Dec2014, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p471 

    Systematic reviews aim to summarize all evidence using very rigorous methods in order to address a specific research question with less bias as possible. Systematic reviews are widely used in the field of physical therapy, however not all reviews have good quality. This tutorial aims to guide...

  • A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines. Marušić, Ana; Bošnjak, Lana; Jerončić, Ana // PLoS ONE;2011, Vol. 6 Issue 9, p1 

    Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate evidence about authorship issues and provide synthesis of research on authorship across all research fields. Methods: We searched bibliographical databases to identify articles describing empirical quantitive or qualitative...

  • Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices. Bennett, Carol; Khangura, Sara; Brehaut, Jamie C.; Graham, Ian D.; Moher, David; Potter, Beth K.; Grimshaw, Jeremy M. // PLoS Medicine;Aug2011, Vol. 8 Issue 8, p1 

    Background: Research needs to be reported transparently so readers can critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of the design, conduct, and analysis of studies. Reporting guidelines have been developed to inform reporting for a variety of study designs. The objective of this study was to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics