TITLE

Appeals court affirms mobile-health ruling

AUTHOR(S)
Silva, Jeffrey
PUB. DATE
October 2003
SOURCE
RCR Wireless News;10/27/2003, Vol. 22 Issue 43, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to affirm a lower court's dismissal of a brain-cancer lawsuit against Motorola Inc. and others. Details of the case; Highlights of the ruling of the lower court; Reaction of the parties to the case; Importance of the ruling to the cellular telephone services industry.
ACCESSION #
11337863

 

Related Articles

  • Judge casts doubt on tossing out headset litigation. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;10/4/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 40, p1 

    Deals with the lawsuits filed against cellular carriers in the U.S. Issues concerning the need for cellular carriers to provide their consumers with headsets to reduce any risk of injury from radiation emitted by mobile phones; Move by U.S. District Court Judge Catherine Blake to dismiss a...

  • 700 MHz proceedings get messy. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;10/8/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 38, p1 

    The article discusses concerns by the mobile telephone industry on the upcoming auction for the 700 MHz frequency band to be conducted by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected Verizon Wireless' emergency motion for...

  • Moto doubles down on Michigan Avenue. Johnsson, Julie // Crain's Chicago Business;1/23/2006, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p3 

    This article reports that Motorola Inc. is doubling the size of MotoCity, its cell phone design center. The firm opened the center on Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, in 2003 to recruit young city dwellers. Schaumburg, Illinois-based Motorola is leasing another floor at the center, where it...

  • 4th Circuit scheduled to hear headset case. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;1/5/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p3 

    Reports on the planned hearing of a headset provision case against the cellular-phone industry by the 4th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals in March 2004. Dismissal of class-action lawsuits that alleged the mobile-phone industry misled consumers about phone safety in March 2003; Rejection of a...

  • MOTO'S MOJO. Salter, Chuck // Fast Company;Apr2006, Issue 104, p50 

    The article presents information on the launch by Motorola Inc. of its Pebl mobile telephone in 2006. If the Motorola Razr was considered a Ferrari automobile, the Motorola Pebl is considered a Volkswagen bug. It is cute and curvy wherein a user can make telephone calls, play games and record...

  • Cell-Phone Reference Design Perks Up 2.5G. Frenzel, Louis E. // Electronic Design;5/12/2003, Vol. 51 Issue 10, p28 

    Features the i.Smart reference design of a cellular telephone handset developed by Motorola Inc. Feature of the hardware design; Basis of the cellular telephone handset design; Advantage of the technological innovation compared to the old models.

  • MOTO'S MOJO. Salter, Chuck // Fast Company;Apr2006, Issue 104, p50 

    The article presents information on the launch by Motorola Inc. of its Pebl mobile telephone in 2006. If the Motorola Razr was considered a Ferrari automobile, the Motorola Pebl is considered a Volkswagen bug. It is cute and curvy wherein a user can make telephone calls, play games and record...

  • Oral argument in Newman case scheduled for June. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;4/7/2003, Vol. 22 Issue 14, p12 

    Reports on the decision of a U.S. Court of Appeals to schedule the oral arguments for the lawsuit filed by Christopher Newman against Motorola Inc. and other wireless firms to be in June 2003. Status of other cases similar to the case filed by Newman; Opinion of government health agencies on...

  • Supreme Court Cases of Interest. FREEMAN, CAROL GARFIEL // Criminal Justice;Summer2014, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p38 

    This section offers Supreme Court cases news briefs as of July 2014. Two court cases on the application of the Fourth Amendment for cellphone searches were argued in cases Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie. Stays of execution were denied by the Court due to dissenting opinion of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics